Obama and the Joyce Foundation. - Shooting Sports Forum


News and Political Forum News and Politics spoken here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2008, 07:36   #1
Full Member
 
ice-nine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: the Nexus of the Universe
Posts: 613
Obama and the Joyce Foundation.

Obama and the Attempt to Destroy the Second Amendment
October 6, 2008 - by David T. Hardy
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers

As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama must demonstrate executive experience, but he remains strangely silent about his eight years (1994-2002) as a director of the Joyce Foundation, a billion dollar tax-exempt organization. He has one obvious reason: during his time as director, Joyce Foundation spent millions creating and supporting anti-gun organizations.
There is another, less known, reason.
During Obama’s tenure, the Joyce Foundation board planned and implemented a program targeting the Supreme Court. The work began five years into Obama’s directorship, when the Foundation had experience in turning its millions into anti-gun “grassroots” organizations, but none at converting cash into legal scholarship.
The plan’s objective was bold: the judicial obliteration of the Second Amendment.
Joyce’s directors found a vulnerable point. When judges cannot rely upon past decisions, they sometimes turn to law review articles. Law reviews are impartial, and famed for meticulous cite-checking. They are also produced on a shoestring. Authors of articles receive no compensation; editors are law students who work for a tiny stipend.
In 1999, midway through Obama’s tenure, the Joyce board voted to grant the Chicago-Kent Law Review $84,000, a staggering sum by law review standards. The Review promptly published an issue in which all articles attacked the individual right view of the Second Amendment.
In a breach of law review custom, Chicago-Kent let an “outsider” serve as editor; he was Carl Bogus, a faculty member of a different law school. Bogus had a unique distinction: he had been a director of Handgun Control Inc. (today’s Brady Campaign), and was on the advisory board of the Joyce-funded Violence Policy Center.
Bogus solicited only articles hostile to the individual right view of the Second Amendment, offering authors $5,000 each. But word leaked out, and Prof. Randy Barnett of Boston University volunteered to write in defense of the individual right to arms. Bogus refused to allow him to write for the review, later explaining that “sometimes a more balanced debate is best served by an unbalanced symposium.” Prof. James Lindgren, a former Chicago-Kent faculty member, remembers that when Barnett sought an explanation he “was given conflicting reasons, but the opposition of the Joyce Foundation was one that surfaced at some time.” Joyce had bought a veto power over the review’s content.
Joyce Foundation apparently believed it held this power over the entire university. Glenn Reynolds later recalled that when he and two other professors were scheduled to discuss the Second Amendment on campus, Joyce’s staffers “objected strenuously” to their being allowed to speak, protesting that Joyce Foundation was being cheated by an “‘agenda of balance’ that was inconsistent with the Symposium’s purpose.” Joyce next bought up an issue of Fordham Law Review.
The plan worked smoothly. One court, in the course of ruling that there was no individual right to arms, cited the Chicago-Kent articles eight times. Then, in 2001, a federal Court of Appeals in Texas determined that the Second Amendment was an individual right.
The Joyce Foundation board (which still included Obama) responded by expanding its attack on the Second Amendment. Its next move came when Ohio State University announced it was establishing the “Second Amendment Research Center” as a thinktank headed by anti-individual-right historian Saul Cornell. Joyce put up no less than $400,000 to bankroll its creation. The grant was awarded at the board’s December 2002 meeting, Obama’s last function as a Joyce director. In reporting the grant, the OSU magazine Making History made clear that the purpose was to influence a future Supreme Court case:
“The effort is timely: a series of test cases - based on a new wave of scholarship, a recent decision by a federal Court of Appeals in Texas, and a revised Justice Department policy-are working their way through the courts. The litigants challenge the courts’ traditional reading of the Second Amendment as a protection of the states’ right to organize militia, asserting that the Amendment confers a much broader right for individuals to own guns. The United States Supreme Court is likely to resolve the debate within the next three to five years.”
The Center proceeded to generate articles denying the individual right to arms. The OSU connection also gave Joyce an academic money laundry. When it decided to buy an issue of the Stanford Law and Policy Review, it had a cover. Joyce handed OSU $125,000 for that purpose; all the law review editors knew was that OSU’s Foundation granted them that breathtaking sum, and a helpful Prof. Cornell volunteered to organize the issue. (The review was later sufficiently embarassed to publish an open letter on the affair).
The Joyce directorate’s plan almost succeeded. The individual rights view won out in the Heller Supreme Court appeal, but only by 5-4. The four dissenters were persuaded in part by Joyce-funded writings, down to relying on an article which misled them on critical historical documents.
Having lost that fight, Obama now claims he always held the individual rights view of the Second Amendment, and that he “respects the constitutional rights of Americans to bear arms.” But as a Joyce director, Obama was involved in a wealthy foundation’s attempt to manipulate the Supreme Court, buy legal scholarship, and obliterate the individual right to arms.
Voters who value the Constitution should ask whether someone who was party to that plan should be nominating future Supreme Court justices.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-a...ond-amendment/
__________________
"Sometimes, just for fun, I refer to corn as ‘maize’; And there’s not a damn thing 'The Man' can do about it."

ice-nine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 08:22   #2
hostilenativelibertarian.
 
magnomark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oragun-still clinging to my religion,guns,and sour mash!Livin near the most godless American city.
Posts: 7,828
Just more of obomos background that is coming to the surface now!I want to know why so much of this has been repressed prior to this late date so close to the election?Are the republican lobbyists asleep at the wheel,or has this been held back by the dnc?If More of obomas information had been available earlier on-then maybe hillary would have been on the ticket-oh I think I just answered myself!
__________________
...magnomark...
I will stand with the "crackers"should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
...Just take the shot...
The voices in my head say they don't like you!
magnomark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 09:40   #3
Full Member
 
COBRADOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Plant City, FL
Posts: 2,911
Originally Posted by magnomark View Post
Just more of obomos background that is coming to the surface now!I want to know why so much of this has been repressed prior to this late date so close to the election?Are the republican lobbyists asleep at the wheel,or has this been held back by the dnc?If More of obomas information had been available earlier on-then maybe hillary would have been on the ticket-oh I think I just answered myself!
Why has it been held back? Simple answer. Nothing gets broad coverage unless the major TV news networks (ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, MSNBC, etc.) or the major newspapers (NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post, and the ilk) want the information out. It has been well documented, that they are all in Obama's and the Democrats pocket. The major news media doesn't want the information out.
__________________
Guns have only two enemies, rust and politicians.

NRA
Vietnam '68-'69 / '71-'72
Disabled American Veterans
Vietnam Veterans of America
Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association
U.S. Army (Ret.)
COBRADOC is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 10-07-2008, 10:19   #4
hostilenativelibertarian.
 
magnomark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oragun-still clinging to my religion,guns,and sour mash!Livin near the most godless American city.
Posts: 7,828
Cobradoc-I hear ya but what about fox,and why has more info not been brought up on websites?Snopes and factcheck are jokes-altho some people take them for gospel.I smell a rat,and it's coming from obombos corner.
__________________
...magnomark...
I will stand with the "crackers"should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.
...Just take the shot...
The voices in my head say they don't like you!
magnomark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:02   #5
Full Member
 
COBRADOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Plant City, FL
Posts: 2,911
Originally Posted by magnomark View Post
Cobradoc-I hear ya but what about fox,and why has more info not been brought up on websites?Snopes and factcheck are jokes-altho some people take them for gospel.I smell a rat,and it's coming from obombos corner.
Fox and to some extent, the WSJ, has been trying desperately to wave the red flags, but against all the other media they are almost a voice crying in the wilderness. There are just too may air-heads in America today that don't wnat to hear the truth. They are more interested in Opra, American Idle, and who's-screwing-who in Hollywood to stop a take a look at where this country is heading. Most of today's Americans have had a silver spoon in their mouths - maybe they were almost always broke, but it was because of their poor choices and priorities. But have no fear, America is about to get a wake-up call that is going to jerk some of these idiots into reality. And I fear that the day may soon be upon us - and it isn't going to be a pretty picture.
__________________
Guns have only two enemies, rust and politicians.

NRA
Vietnam '68-'69 / '71-'72
Disabled American Veterans
Vietnam Veterans of America
Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association
U.S. Army (Ret.)
COBRADOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 14:49   #6
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,122
Much of the problem with agencies like Fox is that they have cried wolf so much, and yelled so much, they lose their credibility, much like the NRA seems to do. If they would quit sticking their foot into their mouth, perhaps more would listen rather than turn the channel.
__________________
"I have no issues with people of all types being here, I do have a problem with the more extreme ends of any spectrum trying to dominate and push out moderates and opposites." Bill Plein
gossman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 18:39.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
All information is copyright by Perfectunion.com unless already under copyright.