I agree the more legal gun owners the better....and with all the civil unrest even the libtards are seeing they need to protect themselves and are seeing why the 2A is needed...with that said, if the libbies that are now gun owners continue to vote demtard..they are useless to the cause...if they smarten up and see how they were wrong in the past and change, then they are more or less welcome to cross over ...as long as they dont bring their libby ways....Fair enough. Private seller has the right to refuse service to "Legally Unprotected" people. Can't do that with "Legally Protected" folks, such as specifically-mentioned groups; for example: Racial Minorities, or specific Religious groups, to name only a few.
Personally, I think the 2A applies to all Citizens (with certain legal restrictions, such as people convicted of violent crimes), and those that are turned away from gun shops and so forth have one more grudge against 2A supporters, and the 2A itself. It's my belief that the more firearms owners there are, the harder it will be for the Gov't to enact anti-firearms legislation. Might be wrong, but VOTERS with $$ invested in firearms are not likely to want to see their firearms be outlawed, or confiscated.
I think vendors denying 2A rights to anyone sets a bad precedent, and, in the long run, is counterproductive. But private vendors have the right to do so, in many instances. Their call on how they run their business, not mine.
Of course there is the argument that anyone walking into a gun store, and making a Big Point about being a Biden supporter, or a Progressive, might be too stupid to be allowed handle a firearm, or even own one, but that is another discussion, and another thread.
as this can be shown to cause problems where ever they go..just look at the migration of libbies out of california they have infected every state that touches california..they destroy where they are and then move on to destroy where they go with the same libtard ideas...