I've read several descriptions of the trigger job performed by people. Mostly it involved lapping the surfaces of the mating areas to make them smooth. I guess those are the areas (A) on the trigger and (H) on the hammer.
When I pull the trigger, I do feel some "grinding" that indicates the surfaces are rough, and lapping them would make trigger pull smooother - which is a nice thing.
1. The trigger is pulled, against the resistance of the trigger spring and friction of the surface (A) which slides to the right over the surface (H).
2. Just before surface (A) is ready to slip off and release the hammer, the surface © of the sear - which is moving together with the trigger because of the sear spring - comes into contact with the surface (F) of the hammer and does not let trigger move further. I guess that concludes the first stage of the two-stage operation.
3. With increased pressure on the trigger - now against the resistance of compressing sear spring, in addition to the trigger spring and friction of the surfacres, the trigger moves further to the right while the sear stays still, untill the surface (A) finally slips off the surface (H) and the hammer is released and moves up with surfaces © and (F) grinding. I guess lapping the surfaces © and (F) could make that motion smoother and more consistent too.
I do not understand how smoothing the surfaces in question - (A) and (H) - would considerably reduce the trigger pull weight. The friction cannot be that great, compared to the resistance of the sear spring and trigger spring combined, can it?
It would seem that only cutting off a piece of the the sear spring would reduce the trigger weight of the second stage. But all accounts indicate lapping sufficient to bring the weight down considerably.
Any thoughts?
V.
When I pull the trigger, I do feel some "grinding" that indicates the surfaces are rough, and lapping them would make trigger pull smooother - which is a nice thing.
1. The trigger is pulled, against the resistance of the trigger spring and friction of the surface (A) which slides to the right over the surface (H).
2. Just before surface (A) is ready to slip off and release the hammer, the surface © of the sear - which is moving together with the trigger because of the sear spring - comes into contact with the surface (F) of the hammer and does not let trigger move further. I guess that concludes the first stage of the two-stage operation.
3. With increased pressure on the trigger - now against the resistance of compressing sear spring, in addition to the trigger spring and friction of the surfacres, the trigger moves further to the right while the sear stays still, untill the surface (A) finally slips off the surface (H) and the hammer is released and moves up with surfaces © and (F) grinding. I guess lapping the surfaces © and (F) could make that motion smoother and more consistent too.
I do not understand how smoothing the surfaces in question - (A) and (H) - would considerably reduce the trigger pull weight. The friction cannot be that great, compared to the resistance of the sear spring and trigger spring combined, can it?
It would seem that only cutting off a piece of the the sear spring would reduce the trigger weight of the second stage. But all accounts indicate lapping sufficient to bring the weight down considerably.
Any thoughts?
V.
Attachments
-
66.6 KB Views: 982