[Patriot1965]

 

[Nerostarr]

Yes I agree, they function and perform very well. Mine shoots wolf military classic ammo very well and accurately.

 

[Patriot1965]

Yes I agree, they function and perform very well. Mine shoots wolf military classic ammo very well and accurately.

I have them in both 556 and 762 x 39 and at 100 yards they group very well even with steel cased ammo...Ruger has not let me down yet....

 

[Nerostarr]

I just recently picked one up in 350 Legend and finally got it cleaned and scoped with a Vortex 4-12, ready to go. I think it's about time I took it to the range and got it sighted in, tomorrow or the next day will be the day.

 

[Patriot1965]

I just recently picked one up in 350 Legend and finally got it cleaned and scoped with a Vortex 4-12, ready to go. I think it's about time I took it to the range and got it sighted in, tomorrow or the next day will be the day.

vortex make nice scopes for the money, I have a bunch of them..

 

[ECVMatt]

I have two of these. The first one, my son stole....or permanently borrowed.....so I bought another when they went on sale. We shoot Golden Tiger through ours and they rock. Very accurate and no drama shooting the steel cased ammo.

Ruger has a winner with this one.

 

[Logos]

I'd be a buyer if they offered it with a 20 inch non-threaded barrel.

The 16 is just too short to be practical.

 

[Patriot1965]

I'd be a buyer if they offered it with a 20 inch non-threaded barrel.

The 16 is just too short to be practical.

explain why its not practical????

 

[Logos]

explain why its not practical????

Balance and shootability.

It's lacking in weight forward and has unacceptable muzzle flash and muzzle blast due to the short barrel.

 

[Patriot1965]

Balance and shootability.

It's lacking in weight forward and has unacceptable muzzle flash and muzzle blast due to the short barrel.

LOL..your on drugs..have you even shot one??? they shoot great and are comfortable to hold and shoot...you have no idea what your talking about...

 

[Patriot1965]

Balance and shootability.

It's lacking in weight forward and has unacceptable muzzle flash and muzzle blast due to the short barrel.

so you have no follow up comment as you know you are wrong????

 

[Logos]

so you have no follow up comment as you know you are wrong????'

My, but you ARE desperate for attention.

No. I felt no need to comment.

Anyone with years and years of rifle experience (old enough to have read Jack O'Connor) knows that what I said is true.

The little Ruger has its problems but they won't bother the uninitiated.

It's just that I'm not a buyer in the current configuration.

 

[Patriot1965]

My, but you ARE desperate for attention.

No. I felt no need to comment.

Anyone with years and years of rifle experience (old enough to have read buyeO'Connor) knows that what I said is true.

The little Ruger has its problems but they won't bother the uninitiated.

It's just that I'm not a buyer in the current configuration.

as your messiah complex shows through once again...

 

[Wanderson]

I have a 16” Ranch in .300bo unsuppressed and a 22” Predator in 6.5Grendel.
In heavy brush, the 16” .300bo is even handier than my Winchester 94 30-30.
Now for benchrest shooting at paper, a heavier frame is more fun to shoot all day.
But when you’re dragging a rifle through the woods a pound of weight makes a big difference when it’s carried all day.