Joined
·
8,460 Posts
One other aspect I have not seen addressed in this thread is the ideal of which is more durable over the really long haul - super high round count and long long term use.
In this case I would give the advantage to the revolver, since it has no cycling, and the lack of reciprocating parts means no impact within the mechanism. Its just a question of brute strength.
Here's an article that claims a Security Six with 1.4 million rounds fired w/o parts breakage. Ruger Security-Six .357 Magnum Revolver The reference is in the last paragraph.
That's extreme in my book - keep springs at least, since they do sometimes go in use. Yes, I know about polymer frame guns that have gone through super high round counts with little or no parts breakage, but I also know of polymer frames that have ended up as chew toys when someone left 'em where Fido could access them. Fido would need teeth like a woodchipper to hurt a steel frame revolver.
So if you are thinking in terms of the long haul ("I want one gun I will buy when I'm 25 and they can put it in the casket with me when I kick the bucket 6 or 7 decades later") then a revolver may be the way to go. If you're not planning on taking it with you, it could also be the one gun that gets passed down to the young 'uns, should the gun-grabbers win this time or the next (they'll always be back - like the damn' Terminator without the cool shades or accent).
I would pick a steel frame over aluminum, Ruger>S&W>Colt for durability (Colts are notorious for going out of time with hard use). If durability is your only concern (say its an outdoors survival piece in bear country, suitably chambered for say a .44mag), go single action > double action, since the lockwork on the single action is simpler so less likely to go wrong.
If you're thinking in terms of self defense EDC, consider a SP101 (if you can carry it - its a bit big), steel frame S&W J, or Colt Detective Special. For a full sized service gun (4" bbl), a GP100, S&W K frame (.38spl), or S&W L frame (.357 6 shot models only!) would be the way to go. Go stainless for low maintenance, and if you have a blued piece that you want rust resistant consider getting it hard chromed. Given cost considerations I would go Ruger if its new production.
Just some thoughts. If the gun grabbers ever get their way, not only will revolvers be some of the last ones to go on that big list of no-no's but they will be banging away long after possessing one is a big bad crime. Lurk around some of the UK sites and you'll find guides on making your own .38 ammo from scratch. Not economically viable here, even with the drought, but its good to know it can be done at all.
All the best,
Grumpy
In this case I would give the advantage to the revolver, since it has no cycling, and the lack of reciprocating parts means no impact within the mechanism. Its just a question of brute strength.
Here's an article that claims a Security Six with 1.4 million rounds fired w/o parts breakage. Ruger Security-Six .357 Magnum Revolver The reference is in the last paragraph.
That's extreme in my book - keep springs at least, since they do sometimes go in use. Yes, I know about polymer frame guns that have gone through super high round counts with little or no parts breakage, but I also know of polymer frames that have ended up as chew toys when someone left 'em where Fido could access them. Fido would need teeth like a woodchipper to hurt a steel frame revolver.
So if you are thinking in terms of the long haul ("I want one gun I will buy when I'm 25 and they can put it in the casket with me when I kick the bucket 6 or 7 decades later") then a revolver may be the way to go. If you're not planning on taking it with you, it could also be the one gun that gets passed down to the young 'uns, should the gun-grabbers win this time or the next (they'll always be back - like the damn' Terminator without the cool shades or accent).
I would pick a steel frame over aluminum, Ruger>S&W>Colt for durability (Colts are notorious for going out of time with hard use). If durability is your only concern (say its an outdoors survival piece in bear country, suitably chambered for say a .44mag), go single action > double action, since the lockwork on the single action is simpler so less likely to go wrong.
If you're thinking in terms of self defense EDC, consider a SP101 (if you can carry it - its a bit big), steel frame S&W J, or Colt Detective Special. For a full sized service gun (4" bbl), a GP100, S&W K frame (.38spl), or S&W L frame (.357 6 shot models only!) would be the way to go. Go stainless for low maintenance, and if you have a blued piece that you want rust resistant consider getting it hard chromed. Given cost considerations I would go Ruger if its new production.
Just some thoughts. If the gun grabbers ever get their way, not only will revolvers be some of the last ones to go on that big list of no-no's but they will be banging away long after possessing one is a big bad crime. Lurk around some of the UK sites and you'll find guides on making your own .38 ammo from scratch. Not economically viable here, even with the drought, but its good to know it can be done at all.
All the best,
Grumpy