Special issuue of SGN, had an interesting 3 page article on gun laws. They stated: "The "assault rifle ban" was written by those who hate, and don't understand guns. So it contains many a trap for the unwary." It had 5 paragraphs on the traps for the Ruger 10/22. It pointed that the Ruger 10/22 already has 1 evil feature, and that is the capability to accept hi-cap mags, we are only allowed 1 more. A folding stock has 2 evil features, (1) folding stock, (2) protruding pistol grip. This makes 3 Unless it was assembled before the Sept 13 1994 assualt ban. Even then the "burdon of proof lies with the owner", that this was configured before the ban. This is to say you will be held guilty, unless "you can prove" otherwise by documentation. The penalty for that infraction is 10 years in prison , and a $25,000 fine.
Now I had a pre ban configured 10/22 with a RamLine folder. (I sold it, wish I hadn't as I didn't even know about the ban.), but there is no way I could prove I put the stock on before the ban, as who would keep a receipt for a $19.95 stock? Stupid Laws. The only relief is there dosen't seem to be a consentrated effort to back up this dumb law, yet!
Now I had a pre ban configured 10/22 with a RamLine folder. (I sold it, wish I hadn't as I didn't even know about the ban.), but there is no way I could prove I put the stock on before the ban, as who would keep a receipt for a $19.95 stock? Stupid Laws. The only relief is there dosen't seem to be a consentrated effort to back up this dumb law, yet!