Steel Frame vs. Aluminum Alloy Frame - Shooting Sports Forum

Revolver Talk Revolvers only!

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2011, 07:39   #1
Full Member
bmcgilvray's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,342
Steel Frame vs. Aluminum Alloy Frame

I've been making a habit of carrying a couple of popular Smith & Wesson 5-Shot .38 Specials lately, alternately toting either the Chief's Special or the Model 642. I'm trying to determine if the light weight of the Airweight model is that much of a boon to concealed carry over the original steel J-Frame and how both compare with the Colt Detective Special I've been frequently carrying around town in recent years.

I've toted both with and without pocket holster, in Levi's 550 jeans pockets, Dockers' pockets, and in business suit trouser pockets (with De Santis Nemesis holster-trouser pockets are flimsy). I have a belt holster but haven't used it because I don't generally wear a covering garment except to church. Any Smith & Wesson 5-shot .38 Special holstered and riding on a belt is no chore to pack anyway.

I can't really tell much difference for my purposes. I can tell a little more difference in shooting the two side by side. I've put a lot of stock in the weight advantage of shooting the steel-framed model but really there is not even all that much difference in the two styles. In great quantities, the +P 158 grain ammunition is not that much of a joy to shoot in either revolver. Both of my revolvers have standard factory walnut stock panels.

Have y'all formed an opinion about the relative advantages of these two types of Smith & Wesson revolvers? The Airweigth is ok but I'm thinking it is a bit overrated simply because I can't tell much difference.

There ain't no flies on the Detective Special either.
bmcgilvray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 08:11   #2
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: camp verde az
Posts: 1,044
I think the alloy thing is way overrated ill stick with my old mod 36.seems you just get sharper recoil with the lighter guns and they get to charge more bucks for more pain?
curt mini14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 14:17   #3
Full Member
larryp's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Big Arm Montana
Posts: 175
I used to have a 642 and now own a 649. The differance in weight as far as carrying doesn't seem very much to me but when it comes to recoil the steel 649 recoils with 110 gr. .357 loads no more than the alloy 642 did with 38 +p loads. To me being able to shot a more powerful cartridge with the same amount of control cancels out the weight advantage of the alloy gun.
larryp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 12:49   #4
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 33
Steel for my revolvers here. The aluminum frame for revolvers don't fit with me and my 357's, 44's, etc, etc. I like the weight of the steel frame revolvers because the weight helps in recoil and it feels like a real pistol. Also the weight for carrying is not all that bad. People go to extremes with this because this firearm weighs an ounce or two more than this firearm its extremely heavy...(shakes head). I read people complaining how heavy a revolver is and saying its no good and go to the alloy. Next thing you hear they are complaining about how bad the recoil is from the aluminum frame!...and start saying its no good, again...newbs. Time for people to stop hitting the keyboard and start working out. If you can not hang with the big dogs then stay on the porch.
FoghornLeghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2011, 18:25   #5
Full Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 183
I carried a 642 for quite a few years. I didn't have any issues with it and it's sitting in the safe right now. I did find that I prefer to carry my 19-3. I like the steel frame for recoil management and it's pre lock which is preferable.

I don't have an issue with the alloy frame pistols though.

bulk 38 spl ammo
BulkAmmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2011, 14:29   #6
Full Member
jeepster09's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 116
I have found for extended daily carry I like the weight savings of my 360pd. For shooting in my opinion MagNaPorting is a must to tame the recoil.

jeepster09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 01:48   #7
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 258
I've carried a 442 for over a year, but it doesn't see much range time. I prefer steel frames if I plan to fire a gun often, but alloy does well for daily carry.
wlhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2011, 19:11   #8
Full Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: McLeansville, NC by way of WV
Posts: 231
I apologize if this is redundant. A year ago I started competing in Pocket Carry Competition Association. Two categories: Pocket Carry: 3.12" J frame or similar revolver or semi-auto. Discreet Carry: K or L frame 3" barrel or less. Semi auto 3.65"or less.

Rule Book

A bunch of us found out how difficult it is to shoot the midget guns. A bunch of us carry these but we cannot shoot them.
Life is too short to drink cheap booze and argue with stupid people.
Strangers are friends ready to happen. SASS29170L
Red Cent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 16:28   #9
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 52
I'm a big fan of my 638. Certainly not a gun I go to the range with to shoot a couple of hundred rounds, Just the gun in my pocket that I know will go bang when I need it.
jedwil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2011, 12:33   #10
XR750's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: state of confusion.
Posts: 178
I like a steel frame revolver, They help to absorb the recoil of full power rounds like the .357 mag or more powerful. An alloy frame is ok in a .38 special or smaller or for a back up gun.
Joe R
A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences. Proverbs 22:3
XR750 is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:47.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
All information is copyright by unless already under copyright.