Moore's motive for selling out and aiding and abetting the destroyers of the earth is obvious.
According to a statement by Greenpeace, "Patrick Moore frequently portrays himself as a founder or co-founder of Greenpeace, and many news outlets have repeated this characterization. Although Mr. Moore played a significant role in Greenpeace Canada for several years, he did not found Greenpeace." 
After he left Greenpeace, Moore began work with the Nuclear Energy Institute front group, the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition. He has also worked for the mining industry, the logging industry, PVC manufacturers, the nuclear industry, and in defense of biotechnology. In October 2008, Greenpeace issued a statement distancing itself from Moore, saying he "exploits long gone ties with Greenpeace to sell himself as a speaker and pro-corporate spokesperson, usually taking positions that Greenpeace opposes."
Another character defect he shares with you cultists: He's a liar for continually misrepresenting his role at Greenpeace.
Today's "conservative" movement is entirely based on lies. Literally. This is just one more example. Scratch a "conservative" claim, find a lie.
Originally Posted by my1911s
If one looks at the nature of science and its self correcting mechanism, one is forced to conclude that the voice of decent is of the greatest importance.
That in science there can never be anything called "settled science" because the very nature of science requires that everything must be open forever to question.
You meant "dissent," but yes, that part of your post is very true.
Originally Posted by my1911s
When someone tells you that Global Warming is "settled science", you may be absolutely certain that you are in the presence of a liar, a crook and a swindler.
You, with your straw man, are the swindler. You either do not understand what science is, at all, or you're a deceiver. Innumerable aspects of global warming are unsettled, and unknown. What is known, is how the greenhouse effect works, that it is and has been occurring for some decades now, and that the massive percentage increases due to carbon dioxide emitted from human industrial activity is a primary driver.
Yeah, the guy wanted to work and make a real living. He found out that his environmental views were based on green nazi religion instead of "true science". There have been earthquakes, tornadoes, volcanic eruptions and nuclear war. As hard as we try, mankind can't seem to destroy God's creation. Global warming is a lie of the fascist left cultists marxists.
For good article on anthro warming theory check out last Friday's piece in Washington Post by Charles Krauthammer. I don't think I can post links.
My theory is that it is mainly another way to legitimize social engineering. All the ism political movements killed too many millions before falling in on themselves so "global warming" is the latest attempt to find the ring to rule them all.
For good article on anthro warming theory check out last Friday's piece in Washington Post by Charles Krauthammer.
Charles Krauthammer is a right wing opinionator, not a climate scientist. He doesn't even know much at all about climate science.
Which makes him an ideal candidate to shill for the fossil fuel industries by spreading a bunch of manure in front of you low info types.
There is no shortage of shills willing to lie for a buck or a few thousand. And no shortage of dupes eager to be told their wasteful and destructive lifestyles won't harm their grandkids after all.
In such ways, human nature has remained remarkably consistent over the millenia.
3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, 4 and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths.
Exactly the point "mr opinionator" was demonstating.
free, you are easily smart enough to see the "theory" is really only a hypothesis due to the muddy evidence and changing science. Too much haze to try to see the promised land with that hypothesis.
Your quote says is best, you reject the socratic scientific method and accept the results you want or need to see. Gotta be double blind in a good way with science or it can do bad things.
Charles Krauthammer calls the President of the United States a whore and its science experts propagandists. We can choose to listen to this unprofessional diatribe and not worry about climate change or we can choose to listen to the 98% of the word’s climate experts who tell us that humans are dangerously warming the planet by dumping billions of tons of heat-trapping gases into the air each year.
We can listen to a man who calls the President a whore, or we can listen to the conclusions of the United States National Academy of Sciences and every international academy of science who agrees that humans are dangerously warming the planet.
We can listen to a man who calls the President a whore, or we can listen to the United States Military and Intelligence community who warn that climate-induced crises could topple governments, feed terrorist movements or destabilize entire regions.
We can listen to a man who calls the President a whore, or we can listen to health officials who warn us that climate change could be the biggest global health threat of the 21st century.
We can listen to a man who calls the President a whore, or we can listen to insurers who manage trillions of dollars when they tell us that climate change is one of the greatest strategic risks currently facing the property/casualty insurance industry.