Location: Oragun-still clinging to my religion,guns,and sour mash!Livin near the most godless American city.
Sounds like all 5 of them were on the mind altering demoKoolaid.[adjusting tinfoil hat now],or that they had all been to a demo "thinktank" and had been brainwashed to become jihadists for the "new party",and joy behar gave them their last instructions!
We've gotta keep guns out of the hands of the nutters. The lives of our children are at stake! We need a national background check system. It can be pretty simple. All it has to do is look at voter roles. Republican? No gun for you.
We also need a standardized national gun ownership application questionnaire. The most important question on there would be as follows:
You can have my gun when:
A. You pry it from my cold, dead fingers
B. You've paid for it in blood
C. You find where I've hidden it
D. An appropriate officer of the law or government official asks for it
Any answer other than "D" (for Democrat) is an automatic DQ.
When guns are outlawed, only Republicans will have guns.
Guns don't kill people. Your Republican mother does.
What's next? Ford vs Chevy owners in the the mass murder tally? Yankees versus Sox?
It's pathetic. ON BOTH SIDES
Mental illness is not defined by politics, no matter what Michael Savage may have you believe or Piers Morgan for that matter. It trivializes the serious underlying issues. I wish people would think for themselves. Goodbye sweet America.
Well, would you look at that. The left wing moonbats can post links to crap about 'right wing violence' and call our service people dangerous terrorist, but they go batchit crazy, when you post an article that shows that the real dangerous mass murders have been their kind.
Do you crazy leftist moonbats really want to talk about gun violence and what the causes are? Are you ready to be honest about it? Are you ready to look at the facts about who and what is really dangerous?
The five worst mass killings, where a firearm was used, have a common thread. Hint #1: They didn’t belong to the NRA. They don’t fit the stereotype of the “red-neck” gun owner.
Check it out …
Ft Hood: Registered Democrat/Muslim.
Columbine: Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals.
Virginia Tech: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff; Registered Democrat.
Colorado Theater: Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal.
Connecticut School Shooter: Registered Democrat; hated Christians.
Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats.
I've yet to see any evidence that any of that is true. Some of it may be, but 2dumb posted no evidence of it, only a link to a right wing blog which in turn links to another right wing blog, which in turn, offers exactly zero evidence for those claims.
Some of those claims I know to be false.
2dumb's link, and the stupidly unthinking acceptance of it by some here, are just two more examples of the far right wing nut job addiction to lies.
Just like the truth about many other items of discussion, the Progressive Democrats can't stomach the truth that they create the very folks they want to blame our nation's problems on.
This is nothing new either.
When Slavery was ended by Republicans, resulting in the Civil War, the disgruntled Democrats formed up the KKK.
Today, their rule in Cities like Chicago, DC and NY, have resulted in crime spree wastelands, full of drugs, single mothers and broken dreams/lives.
Yet, they blame these problems on "greedy" conservatives, or too easy access to guns for everyone.
They claim if you make all guns impossible to own, you will have a safe society with no guns.
But, that does not hold water.
Look at Mexico, they have outlawed guns for it's citizens, but have outright war time death rates of innocent civilians... Whoops, can't look there say the Progressives, and/or they claim the guns are from the USA...
Whoops! Problem is, SOME, and it's a very small some, of those guns are from the USA, but the full auto ones, the ones that are used most of the time for most of the killings? They are not from the USA. They are shipped in direct from outside Mexico.
See, what the Demo's don't want everyone to see is that corruption follows/grows on the back of limited gun ownership by law abiding citizens.
When the citizens have no way to defend themselves, or present a united front to corruption, they are helpless to do much more than hope they can hide when the bad guys come calling. (Either the Drug Cartels, or the equally corrupt Feds in Mexico.)
SO, when idiots from the Progressive side call for your rights to be limited when it comes to guns, look at where they have no gun rights.
Want to end up like Mexico?
You can, all you need to do is keep voting Democrat.
The Sullivan Act in New York state was designed to take guns from the lawful and we still have to follow it's odious rules today. The crime rate in the northern part of the state is pretty low, but go to New York City and you have high crime. Not as high as Chicago, but still higher than the rest of the state.
January 1, 1863 : Emancipation Proclamation frees slaves in liberated former confederate territories.
December 6, 1865 : 13th amendment ratified, formally ending slavery throughout the United States.
Adjuster is a fictionist.
You're new here so perhaps you didn't know. Now you do. But you should have caught the anachronistic faulty causation in the post I replied to.
That's not a trivial point, but not one I would ordinarily criticize someone for getting wrong (for example, had you posted it). But Adjuster routinely and deliberately posts falsehoods, and has for years. Adjuster is a cultist of The Lie. So is the OP.
It means we're getting under the skin of the "collective" here.
By posting even more lies than usual?
You too, Paco. You've obviously put on "extra" blinders. What's it like to stubbornly cling to an entire worldview of falsehood? Are you never tempted to just chuck it and let your thinking correspond to what's real and true?
Most of your posts are personal attacks of one sort or another, Paco. You don't post much of on-topic substance at all. So it would seem someone or something is getting under your skin. Not that that's my intention. It is your intention, but ironically, it seems to be happening to you instead.
That's increasingly the case for your partner in frustration, 2dumb too.
Most of your posts are personal attacks, Paco. You don't post much of on-topic substance at all. So it would seem someone or something is getting under your skin. Not that that's my intention. That your intention, but ironically, it seems to be happening to you instead.
You spewed a higher ratio of personal and gratuitous insults than just about anyone else since the moment you arrived on this forum, Paco. That is most of what you post. You obviously have very little to say. Oh sure, you agree with what others post (usually when they're slinging insults), but most of your original content is, whether directed towards me or others, hateful and void of substance.
If I seem like a "bully" to you, it's because that's just what you are and have been since your day one.