A nutjob national SOCIALIST bites the dust .. he should not have taken his family ...hope he rots in hell with all of the murderous NAZIS and Communists that want to lord over free people everywhere ...
You and your lleftist blog obviously have no understanding of the history of National Socialism ,,,
It's you right wing revisionists who don't. Seriously, you're just wrong about it, as you are about so much else.
All you need do to correct your error is look at what the Nazis actually did, and who supported and abetted their seizure of power. It was no one on the left, rather, the exact same elements of society that presently support right wing politics in this country today.
The Nazi program was entirely antithetical to liberal and leftist ideology and practice. In fact, leftists of all kinds were among the first to be beaten, killed and thrown into concentration camps.
---------------
Today's Nazis are somewhat different from those of 1920-45, but they have the same basic ideology of hate. Tell me, 'poot, do these guys sound like leftists to you?
Reporters Beaten by Mob of Blacks and Their Newspaper Stayed Silent
How strange, the Goebbels liberal media staying silent about black crime, and brown crime for that matter.
Ethical questions are being raised both inside The Virginian-Pilot and in the Norfolk, Va. area after two of the paper’s reporters were attacked and beaten by a mob of at least 30 blacks, but was downplayed by police and withheld from the public for more than two weeks by the newspaper’s editors.
Reporters Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami were leaving a concert on the night of April 14 when a crowd of around 100 young people gathered on the sidewalk near their car. Rostami reached over to lock the door.
It's you right wing revisionists who don't. Seriously, you're just wrong about it, as you are about so much else.
All you need do to correct your error is look at what the Nazis actually did, and who supported and abetted their seizure of power. It was no one on the left, rather, the exact same elements of society that presently support right wing politics in this country today.
The Nazi program was entirely antithetical to liberal and leftist ideology and practice. In fact, leftists of all kinds were among the first to be beaten, killed and thrown into concentration camps.
---------------
Today's Nazis are somewhat different from those of 1920-45, but they have the same basic ideology of hate. Tell me, 'poot, do these guys sound like leftists to you?
Labor unions brought the nazis to power.
The term liberal dirives from liberty. I am a classical liberal. The term today has been hijacked by the progressive movement, which really ces from marksim. Marksist and fascist don't get along. Marksism is all forms of production to the state. Fascism is the cooperative releasionship between state and corporation. Marks is the socialization of profit and losses. Fascism the privatizeation of profit and socializing of loss.
You're comparing right and left wing of socialism. A completely different scale.
These terms were created to covelude the concepts of liberty to begin with. I'm the end it's all still socialism. And the ruse has been very successful.
__________________
"The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." -George Washington
That's a typical example of right wing revisionist bull****.
When Hitler came to power in January 1933, he saw trade unions as exercising more power over the workers than he could. Therefore, trade unions were seen as a challenge to be dispensed with. Hitler knew that he needed the workers to be on his side but he could not allow trade unions to exert the potential power they had. Therefore, trade unions were banned in Nazi Germany and the state took over the role of looking after the working class.
Just months after Hitler was appointed Chancellor, he took the decision to end trade unions in Nazi Germany. On May 2nd, 1933, police units occupied all trade unions headquarters and union officials and leaders were arrested. The funds that belonged to the trade unions – effectively this was workers money – were confiscated. However, Hitler had to be careful. He had only been in power for a few months and there were many members of the working class he had to deal with. If the working class movement in Germany organised itself, it would have presented the new Chancellor with a lot of major issues that would have to be dealt with. Removing trade union leaders helped this but it did not fully guarantee that the working class would ‘behave’ itself. Hitler had to offer the workers something more. Hitler announced that the German Labour Force, headed by Robert Ley, would replace all trade unions and would look after the working class. The title was chosen carefully. The new organisation was deliberately cloaked in patriotism, as it was now a German entity as was seen in its title. The working class was now a ‘labour force’. The Nazi Party did all that it could to ensure the workers felt that they were better off under the guidance of the Nazi Party via the German Labour Front.
They had to be brought onto the side of the Nazis as Hitler had major plans for the workers. There were simply too many of them to brutalise into submission, so the workers were offered the ‘Strength Through Joy’ movement (Kraft durch Freude’) which offered them subsidised holidays, cheap theatre trips etc.
...
Right wingers lie about a lot, and some of their biggest whoppers are about fascism and nazism. They are afraid the people will see their program for what it is.
Hitler was a socialist just like LaRaza leaders and leftists in general, the kenyan uses socialist ideals to pass laws and regulations which stifle free enterprise and kill our economic base.
You're a habitual liar Imposter, and I don't make that claim lightly.
Who voted for Hitler?
...
Because of the unprecedented circumstances in which free and fair democratic elections led to the antidemocratic National Socialist Party winning control of the Weimar Republic, the question of who voted for Hitler has become the most studied in the history of voting behaviour research.
The latest study, a Swiss-US collaboration between a social scientist, statistician, mathematician and economist, sets out to discover who had an interest, specifically an economic interest, in voting for Hitler.
There is a vast existing body of literature on why the German people - eventually 38.7 per cent of the electorate in 1933 - voted for the Austrian.
...
In more than 70 years of research almost every social group has been blamed for having backed Hitler at the ballot box, and indeed support for the party was spread across the social spectrum.
However this study, published in the Journal of Economic History, identifies a set of people – "the working poor" – who stood to benefit most from Nazi policies. It also confirms that they voted proportionally more for the Nazis.
The group includes the self-employed, typically small shopkeepers, farmers and artisans, farm labourers and domestic servants, but excludes the unemployed and factory workers.
Rural labourers, domestic servants and family members helping relatives are significant groups that have been completely overlooked by previous literature, according to Wagner and his colleagues.
"We have the best data on that group and were able to look at their behaviour," he said.
...
Unlike industrial workers, these rural and domestic workers had no social security net in the form of unemployment insurance. Likewise, small shopkeepers did not officially become unemployed - they just made less money.
Therefore these groups did not have any stake in the government's unemployment policies and were more drawn to the free enterprise promises of the Nazis.
Anyway back on topic. Speaking as a conservative, whether this man was a nazi, rightwing, bootlicking liberal, or the real slim shady. Killing his family before killing himself was doing what needed to be done in reverse. Its clear this man was completely off his meds and a racist. Whatever wing you decide he belongs to what he did cant be condoned by anyone.
Anyway back on topic. Speaking as a conservative, whether this man was a nazi, rightwing, bootlicking liberal, or the real slim shady. Killing his family before killing himself was doing what needed to be done in reverse. Its clear this man was completely off his meds and a racist. Whatever wing you decide he belongs to what he did cant be condoned by anyone.
qman on that I am in complete agreement.
Well, except for the meds part. We don't know about that. Live by an evil, violent and hateful creed and sooner or later bad things happen. In this instance, awful things.
Anyway back on topic. Speaking as a conservative, whether this man was a nazi, rightwing, bootlicking liberal, or the real slim shady. Killing his family before killing himself was doing what needed to be done in reverse. Its clear this man was completely off his meds and a racist. Whatever wing you decide he belongs to what he did cant be condoned by anyone.
But all of that means nothing to the Libtards like freeksw. What is more important is how they can twist the truth to their benefit.
I'm no fan of modern day nazi's but, they don't cross the border in hordes like cockroaches committing crimes, stealing tax payer money, retirement funds, overloading our medical and legal systems, murdering, and raping as illegal aliens do.
The term "nazi" is being used as a diversion in this case to gain sympathy for the bad illegal aliens and generate hate against whites.
^ Imposter exhibits his usual disdain for reality.
Originally Posted by KingANuthin
The term liberal dirives from liberty. I am a classical liberal. The term today has been hijacked by the progressive movement, which really ces from marksim. Marksist and fascist don't get along. Marksism is all forms of production to the state. Fascism is the cooperative releasionship between state and corporation. Marks is the socialization of profit and losses. Fascism the privatizeation of profit and socializing of loss.
I'm no fan of modern day nazi's but, they don't cross the border in hordes like cockroaches committing crimes, stealing tax payer money, retirement funds, overloading our medical and legal systems, murdering, and raping as illegal aliens do.
The term "nazi" is being used as a diversion in this case to gain sympathy for the bad illegal aliens and generate hate against whites.
But that's what liberals do.
I dont agree with DH's wording but I do agree that if the illegals werent coming over here in droves and causing the problems stated by DH then maybe there wouldnt be people like this nazi bastard on the border causing problems. The government refuses to do anything and I dont have issues with good people trying to do something. Unfortunatly Mr. Ready isnt what I would call good people.
I think anyone who thinks JT Ready was anything other than a publicity seeking power hungry whacko is a bigger nut than he is ...
Then of course Freek blesses us with a cut and paste dissertation on Nazism ..see any hypocrisy here? Republicans run away from Ready, while Socialist Dems have been running from National Socialism since WWII. I cannot wait until November ....
I have never even heard of this guy before so he's not very """notorious""" as the leftist media claims, but I do know 20% of our prison system is comprised of violent mexicans, many who hate white people and support violence against us and America in general.
I love good ole boys and new ole boys, you free are just a poor bitter little racist who's only hope in life is a handout of stolen money from some worthless bum like the Kenyan.
Linear Mode
