"Now a new batch posted in late November to a Russian server shows that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit refused to share their U.S. government-funded data with anyone they thought would disagree with them."
"The fact that they are trying to keep people from replicating their studies -- that's the issue," Watts noted. "Replication is the most important tenet of science."
Now let's watch to see gullible hypocrites defend the actions of the "scientists" and the government that works in collusion with them to promote the utter hoax that "global warming" actually is.
Now let's watch to see gullible hypocrites defend the actions of the "scientists" and the government that works in collusion with them to promote the utter hoax that "global warming" actually is.
Of course they did. If it got out that it was all a ''Big Green Lie'' the government cant manipulate the masses anymore and some very powerful people stand to lose a fortune.
As far as fox news is concerned Im sure MOST Americans trust them over any other ''Lamestream'' media source. I think its been proven time and time again. Im sure your treehugger/communist types will disagree.
British police say they have seized equipment as part of an investigation into thousands of emails stolen from the University of East Anglia two years ago.
The University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit became embroiled in controversy in 2009 when climate change skeptics, using more than 1,000 emails stolen from the center, charged that scientists had tampered with data to exaggerate the threat of global warming.
Several inquiries have since refuted the charges.
...
Fox already thoroughly discredited themselves (which granted, is what they do best) during and after "Climategate 1," by giving an absurd amount of coverage to it and worse, claiming it proved something it didn't. And when the real proof came in, did Fox spend one-hundredth of the time covering their retraction? No, in their typical journalistic malpractice, they did not. And now they're doing it again.
...
We’ve all seen those color-coded air-quality charts on the news — warnings about smog, ozone, and pollen. Now it may be time to add a new alert to the list: illegal drugs. Researchers have found that regions with greater cocaine and marijuana use have higher levels of these drugs in the surrounding atmosphere.
...
"State hopes to break car owners' habit of changing oil too often
California launches a campaign against the widespread notion that oil changes are needed every 3,000 miles. Officials say the practice wastes millions of gallons of oil a year."
We must have "officials" now to tell us how to run our lives in the most minute details.
Noe one's stopping you from leaving a legacy of pollution if you're intent on it, bmcgilvray. You too Parnelli.
Fact is, with new motor oils you don't need to change your oil as often as you used to. Maybe you already know that, but it's obvious that many don't.
Improvement in oils, friction proofing and car engines have lengthened the oil-change interval, typically 7,500 miles to 10,000 miles for most vehicles.
Changing motor oil according to manufacturer specifications would reduce motor-oil demand in California by about 10 million gallons a year, the agency said. The state has created a website, checkyournumber.org, where drivers can look up the suggested motor-oil change interval number for their vehicles.
You think this is "silly," like you thought keeping the proper tire pressure was "silly," because, either
1. You don't know what extracting, refining, using and disposing of petroleum products really does to the environment.
or
2. You do know, but deny it for some nefarious reason.
It's all about control free... not how long your oil lasts. You just don't get it do you? Of course why should you? You march lock step with the control freaks!
Noe one's stopping you from leaving a legacy of pollution if you're intent on it, bmcgilvray. You too Parnelli.
Fact is, with new motor oils you don't need to change your oil as often as you used to. Maybe you already know that, but it's obvious that many don't.
You think this is "silly," like you thought keeping the proper tire pressure was "silly," because, either
1. You don't know what extracting, refining, using and disposing of petroleum products really does to the environment.
or
2. You do know, but deny it for some nefarious reason.
Too bad your propaganda campaign is going to die in the face of the righteous and at the tongue of the truth tellers, we will prevail over you and cleanse the earth of your evil.
Now aside from all that, lets inform people of a few facts, like how much cleaner the air is today even with increased energy use.
It's about control. That's all environmentalism is about, control. Nitwits who get on board with the notion of a "green" environment are too gullible and stupid to see how they are dupes, being used to further an agenda. An agenda of control over the population.
We have lost our liberty and nobody is noticing.
I was conversing with a Jr. High principal and her assistant last week and she mentioned that the state of Alabama (I believe that's the state mentioned) has made it a crime for a teacher to accept a gift of any intrinsic value from a student or a parent. If the gift has a monetary value of more than $5 then the teacher faces criminal charges and $5000 fines.
Good Grief! Back when I was in banking I could accept gifts up to $100 before a RICO Act violation occurred. Not that anyone ever felt benevolent enough to give me gifts. Now, teachers trying to impart an education to this generations' ill-bred, ill-behaved, bratty kids are penalized for receiving gifts. It's insulting! It's criminal on the part of legislators and bureaucrats who foist such nonsense on us.
She went on to add that in Texas, parents can't bring homemade goodies to class parties anymore. All snacks must be pre-packaged, store-bought. So now school principals must agonize over thwarting moms who attempt to bring contraband brownies and oatmeal cookies to class parties.
Our government is way, way out of control! There is no way such tedious and excessive regulation is appropriate!
And nitwits who embrace and promote liberal causes ARE the reason for our nations' loss of individual freedoms and for the decline of liberty. Funny how liberalism works that way, isn't it?
In case y'all didn't notice... I hate liberalism! I hate it in all its deceitful and insidious forms. I also loathe anyone who promotes liberalism. They are crummy, second rate citizen of this nation who aren't as good as thoughtful conservative citizens.
And spineless moderates are just as loathsome, as are the greatest majority of sell-out Republicans currently in office.
I noticed. I have noticed for years. It makes me mad as hell along with millions of other Americans who have taken about all that they can of this liberal nonsense.
[QUOTE=Parnelli;68395.
OBTW propagandist I wash my spoons.[/QUOTE]
Turncoat!! Don't you know that no self-respecting conservative washes their spoons! It's plastic spoons, paper plates and styrofoam cups all the way for this anti-environment cultist. Plus I kick dogs and push little old ladies aside in the grocery store check out line. C'mon, Parnelli, you gotta man up if you're gonna count yourself among our cult.
Getting under your skin is so much fun it should be a video game. 
Linear Mode
