Feinstein Pushes Bill to Repeal DOMA, Ensure Federal Benefits to ‘Married’ Gays

[Dirty Harry]

This is yet another reason to cap federal spending, they'll only rip the money out of our wallets to pay for such silliness, and it will give """government""" one more reason to GROW.

Makes my stomach turn.

http://cnsnews.com/sites/default/fil...0feinstein.jpg

(CNSNews.com) – Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) has introduced a bill to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and replace it with the Respect for Marriage Act, which would recognize “married” same-sex couples in the same way as married men and women and ensure those gay couples are eligible to receive federal benefits.

Feinstein Pushes Bill to Repeal DOMA, Ensure Federal Benefits to

[higgite]

What a crock. Feinstein's bill should be called the Disrespect for Marriage Act.

[Parnelli]

Feinsttein comes from a CA district that is home to a huge gay community. She has always been a leftist waco, and I'm sure she is feeling the pressure of a deeply angered nation; so she is turning to her stalwart supporters and buttering (no pun intended) them up to re-elect her.

[curt mini14]

it aint ok to be gay.

[bmcgilvray]

Aberrant behavior must never be rewarded by protection under law.

[Momo]

Just think, Feinstein is actually the more intelligent of the two 'honorable' Senators from CA.

As long as they keep it to theirselves I don't care what gays do, but trying to force general acceptance of their abhorrent behavior through forced legislation is tyranny. Of course as long as they're the ones who get to do the tyrannizing the libs are all in favor of that.

[qwman68]

Originally Posted by Momo Just think, Feinstein is actually the more intelligent of the two 'honorable' Senators from CA. As long as they keep it to theirselves I don't care what gays do, but trying to force general acceptance of their abhorrent behavior through forced legislation is tyranny. Of course as long as they're the ones who get to do the tyrannizing the libs are all in favor of that.

I totally agree. I believe its not for me to judge but dont expect me to go along and think its ok. I personally dont think it is ok.

[Parnelli]

I agree. I believe in freedom, and it is none of my business what one does behind closed doors. On the other hand where does one draw the line? Gay rights are OK? Gay marriage is OK? What is next, beatiality? Ok, what you do to your dog, sheep, horse, goat is up to you. After that what is left? Child porn? I mean hey they will claim it to be a lifestyle preference.

At what point in this madness do rights become debaucherry? Who decides when that line is being crossed? The leftist gay agenda is about WAY more than gay rights; they are just the tip of the iceberg. It is about re-defining the english language; it is about pulling down moral barriers; it is about the destruction of a society through Hedonism; a practice that brought both the Greek and Roman empires to their knees.

[bmcgilvray]

Thanks Parnelli;

I was going to get back on here to make the same point about all other forms of deviancy. You are entirely correct.

[Parnelli]

I have sworn an oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foriegn and domestic. Therefore I stand for the freedoms of all, even people I disagree with. Know this though; freedom bears with it the burden of responsibility; thus if you can't be responsible you can't be free.

I struggle with this at times. I mean, what right have I to dictate moral principles to another? Yet there are those others who would have no respect for my rights or principles. I guess that's where one must draw the line; when you have violated my rights you have negated your own. Edmund Burke said something to the effect that "All it takes for the advancement of evil is for good men to do nothing."

Someone wants to be gay? Fine; then shut up and be gay, but don't try and FORCE me to accept your lifestyle. It is no more right than if I tried to force them to accept Christianity... and most of them would not stand for that at all. Not one bit.