Model-94 Win. experts - Page 2 - Shooting Sports Forum

Lever Action Talk Lever Action firearms of all makes

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2012, 23:04   #26
tholifield13's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ms
Posts: 3
does it make it less of a gun than the pre 64
tholifield13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2012, 09:55   #27
Full Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 106
Winchester '94's

does it make it less of a gun than the pre 64?

Thought I'd give my 2 cents worth here, even tho at today's inflation rates it doesn't amount to much.....after nearly 40 years behind a retail gun counter, one learns and hears alot!

The post '64 Model '94's had the same barrels and receivers (forged, milled and machined) as the pre-'64's. The things that were changed were the alloy and finish on the receiver, which is usually called black chrome and there were minor changes in the wood, mostly cosmetic. A few internal parts were changed, from flat spring to coil and the cartridge lifter/carrier. For some reason, the gun buying public just could not stand that cartridge lifter changed to a stamped out part in lieu of the previous machined/milled part. It functioned perfectly well and never was a problem, except for sales. We had phun in our shop in the 1960's and '70's when a client would complain about this item - we would usually ask what kind of shotgun he owned, and, the answer was often, "A Remington Model 870", which is a famous firearm in its own right. Whether you know it or not, the Remington 870 is comprised mostly of stamped out parts. Also, the Internationally famous AK-47 military firearm, and, they perform and function just fine. Much cheaper to manufacture, of course. Winchester listened and changed the cartridge lifter back to a machined part and now the stamped cartridge lifters in the Model '94 is somewhat of a rarity. Maybe they'll become a highly sought after collector's gun??!! Hee, hee.....
RCRBanjo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 16:13   #28
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mountain West
Posts: 652
I blundered into a $200 M94 made in 1973. I don't consider it any less reliable or effective a rifle just because it doesn't have some of the features of a pre-64. I also own 2 of those, by the way. The 1973 rifle has a milled (forged?) lifter though. The only M94 I ever owned with a stamped lifter was in .44 Magnum. It worked just fine too.
hoplophile is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:21.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
All information is copyright by unless already under copyright.