FN-FAL Talk Tech Talk about the Fabrique Nationale FAL and it's variants.

Like Tree48Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-07-2011, 04:46   #1
Full Member
Points: 9,742, Level: 66 Points: 9,742, Level: 66 Points: 9,742, Level: 66
Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 618
308 rifles too heavy

good for long distance shooting, but this video shows it is not a tactical run and gun option.

the rifles are just too heavy.


Find All Video
Magog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 07:58   #2
Full Member
Points: 6,320, Level: 51 Points: 6,320, Level: 51 Points: 6,320, Level: 51
Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 112
Originally Posted by Magog View Post
good for long distance shooting, but this video shows it is not a tactical run and gun option.

the rifles are just too heavy.


Find All Video
that is funny, plenty of soldiers used heavy 30 caliber rifles in WWII, Korea and Vietnam under real battlefield conditions.You should not put so much faith in the "games" you see people play when no one is shooting at them. Another thing to add is if these rifles are "obsolete" why were so many sent to Iraq?
H2O MAN and Brenman like this.
wonderdog451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2011, 11:01   #3
Registered Member
Points: 666, Level: 13 Points: 666, Level: 13 Points: 666, Level: 13
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 4
I lugged an FN C1A1 7.62 (308) for three years. Heavy.....yes........accurate......DEADLY. That negated any weight problems I incurred.
RickyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 17:40   #4
Full Member
Points: 625, Level: 12 Points: 625, Level: 12 Points: 625, Level: 12
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
RubiSCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9
FN SCAR 17, 8.5 lbs of 7.62x51mm justice.
RubiSCAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 19:08   #5
Sniper 173D Abn Brigade
Points: 2,956, Level: 33 Points: 2,956, Level: 33 Points: 2,956, Level: 33
Activity: 3.7% Activity: 3.7% Activity: 3.7%
Last Achievements
 
Herd Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 61
I carried an XM-21 in Viet Nam for sniping and combat duties. I loved that rifle. If it had been a girl I would have married it. Sure, they are a little heavy but in the heat of combat, you won't notice the weight. Trust me on that issue. And when they need a precision shot, that extra weight just isn't there when you shoot it. The .308/7.62 NATO caliber rifles are a little heavier but they are worth it, especially when you're young.
H2O MAN and grumpy_old_man like this.
Herd Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2011, 19:58   #6
Full Member
Points: 4,617, Level: 43 Points: 4,617, Level: 43 Points: 4,617, Level: 43
Activity: 83.6% Activity: 83.6% Activity: 83.6%
Last Achievements
 
bmcgilvray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,345
Nope, they're not too heavy. We've just raised a generation that wants it's firearms ever smaller, ever lighter and so demands stunted models shooting weenie cartridges.
H2O MAN and Brenman like this.
bmcgilvray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2011, 07:19   #7
Administrator
Points: 25,716, Level: 96 Points: 25,716, Level: 96 Points: 25,716, Level: 96
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,598
A 308 rifle is like the trade off between a car and a truck.

A car gets better gas mileage and easier to maneuver in small parking lots.

But when you need to pull a boat, trailer, haul a 4-wheeler, haul some firewood,,,, your going to need a truck.

My DS Arms SA58 is almost 10 pounds, but its got a lot more hitting power then the AR-15.

I bought my FN to be my primary deer hunting rifle. My current rifle is a remington model 700 in 280/7mm express. The 280 ammo is expensive, and its bolt action. I wanted something in 308, semi-auto, detachable magazine and military grade. That does not leave very many options.

H2O MAN likes this.
__________________
shooting sports forum
Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2011, 18:34   #8
Tangled up in "Blues".
Points: 1,514, Level: 22 Points: 1,514, Level: 22 Points: 1,514, Level: 22
Activity: 9.8% Activity: 9.8% Activity: 9.8%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado Plains
Posts: 37
"Tactical run and gun"?

Is that some sort of Olympic event?
Or something for SWAT types to do?

I've run my FAL (full size R1) for nearly a decade alongside other officers who are packing AR's and have had no problem keeping up with them.

Is the gun a bit heavier? Depends.
So many tactical tommy's hang enough sights, flashlights, rails, and doohickey's on their AR that they actually weigh more than my loaded FAL.

I can't carry as much ammo as they can? Fer pete's sake. How many rounds are you gonna put down range? Every bullet you fire has a lawyer attached to it, from the instant you fire it to the time it comes to rest, you are responsible for it. I'd rather use only one bullet (or less) to end a problem and have the rest along for the ride.

I pack 5 mags for the FAL and the AR. That means 100 rounds for the FAL and 150 for the AR, and if I need more than either of those, it's gonna be more of a situation than I can handle myself. Heck, most of the time I ran with the mag in the gun and a spare tucked into a pocket on building searches and other call-outs.

I've shot critters with both the .223 and .308.
The last I shot with the .223 (55gr SP) went way too far considering the hit. A shot from right to left through the diaphragm, heart and lungs, exiting through the front of the chest and the mutt still went 50+ yards, biting, snarling and attacking everything it encountered.

I'll stick with the .308 for anything that may bite, scratch, fight back or shoot back. For hunting, even more so.
H2O MAN and Brenman like this.
whirlibird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 13:35   #9
Full Member
Points: 6,320, Level: 51 Points: 6,320, Level: 51 Points: 6,320, Level: 51
Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 112
i agree with the idea of how much ammo do you really need for most situations? People have seen too many movies where one man unrealistically takes on a small army with a rifle and a handgun, and never misses while his opponents wildly spray and pray in all directions.
H2O MAN likes this.
wonderdog451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2011, 00:40   #10
Full Member
Points: 6,425, Level: 52 Points: 6,425, Level: 52 Points: 6,425, Level: 52
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 326
Originally Posted by Magog View Post
good for long distance shooting, but this video shows it is not a tactical run and gun option.

the rifles are just too heavy.

Only for those in mambi pambi land. Try weight training.
Nobody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 15:48   #11
Full Member
Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 32
Wow! Our WW2 vets carried M1 Garands and an even heavier Thompson SMG's. My uncle was BAR Gunner in Korea and I lugged around a SAW in the 80's.
This gen just has no clue of what really counts.
My neighbor has an AR with $3500.00 worth of doodads and it weighs more than my FAL. Not to mention he has no military training and thinks that Xbox games are preparing him.
Airacuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2011, 18:02   #12
Full Member
Points: 6,656, Level: 53 Points: 6,656, Level: 53 Points: 6,656, Level: 53
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
wolfspotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 249
Shot my first deer, nice buck at about twenty five yards with my Federal Ordnance M14-SA. Peeked around a large tree and there he was, looking at me.
Open sights, straight through the heart. Hunting alone, my first experience dressing a deer also. Never even seen it done but not much different than a squirrel, just bigger.
wolfspotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 14:58   #13
Registered Member
Points: 1,680, Level: 23 Points: 1,680, Level: 23 Points: 1,680, Level: 23
Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5% Activity: 1.5%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by Magog View Post
good for long distance shooting, but this video shows it is not a tactical run and gun option.

the rifles are just too heavy.


Find All Video
I have to laugh when I see this "too heavy" thread popping up on various forums, but I just couldn't resist commenting.
Run 'n Gun? Wazzat? some sort of whiz bang thing they're teaching in these defense courses? Oh Well. We used to call it "Fire and Maneuver", but I guess that that just does not sound as cool.
Well, let's see. seems a lot of guys did a pretty damn good job runnin 'n gunnin' across Europe and up through the Pacific with an eight shot, eight pound rifle, twenty pound BAR and an eleven pound Thompson
It's all in the training. When I arrived on PI, the guy in the armory bounced an M1 off my chest, and I thought my arms were gonna fall off that first day. Three weeks later, I could make that thing sing, dance and walk the dog.
Are the lighter AR's more suitable for some situations and as a general purpose rifle? They seem to be doing okay, but when they really want to reach out and touch someone, the M14 gets the nod, and "too heavy" doesn't come into it.
Just sayin'
H2O MAN and wetncold like this.
warrendee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 15:20   #14
Full Member
Points: 702, Level: 14 Points: 702, Level: 14 Points: 702, Level: 14
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 38
Standard load out is 70 pounds of gear.

It was 70 pounds for the Roman Legionares. No rifle to weigh.
It was 70 pounds for the rev war, the rifle was 10 pounds.
it was 70 pounds in the Civil war, the rifle was 10 pounds
It was 70 pounds in WW1, the rifle was 9.5 pounds.
it was 70 pounds in WW2, the rifle was 9.5 pounds
same in Korea, 9.5 pound rifle.
Same in Viet Namn, rifle was 5.5 pounds.
Same toady, ?

They did not adopt the m16 due to its light weight to reduce the load, they did it so you could get more rounds counted into your 70 pound load.

Not to mention that the Germans used their squad as base of fire while they maneuvered their MG34/42 mg. I have seen many a well motivated man run and gun with an M60.

Is Magog Gunkid?
KYnabob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 18:08   #15
Full Member
Points: 2,408, Level: 29 Points: 2,408, Level: 29 Points: 2,408, Level: 29
Activity: 3.3% Activity: 3.3% Activity: 3.3%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisburg, NC
Posts: 95
As a pasty-skinned, doughy-armed, exercise-phobic lardarse of a man I am finding the idea that a couple of extra pounds is too heavy.

I'd rather carry a "heavy" rifle with a good optic and 100rds that do the job than a lighter, flimsier rifle with 10lbs of dress-up and 200rds of hopped-up .22 that can't punch through a simple block wall, thanks.
NCLivingBrit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2011, 20:41   #16
Full Member
Points: 41,137, Level: 100 Points: 41,137, Level: 100 Points: 41,137, Level: 100
Activity: 22.0% Activity: 22.0% Activity: 22.0%
Last Achievements
 
Brian S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,220
I don't think .308 rifles are that heavy. .50 cal rifles are over 30 lbs.

This is what I would call heavy. It weighs 59lbs to 130+lbs and makes a .50 cal rifle look like an AR15.
MAG-FED 20MM RIFLE - Anzio Ironworks

CrustyShellback likes this.
Brian S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2011, 17:31   #17
Full Member
Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 32
At the range Friday a guy asked what my FAL was and I gave him a short rundown. He said isn't it too heavy? Before I could egumacate him a passer by say's, "I bet this is heavier." It was an AR that the owner claimed weighed 17lbs!.....I believed him.
Airacuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2011, 18:23   #18
Full Member
Points: 1,860, Level: 25 Points: 1,860, Level: 25 Points: 1,860, Level: 25
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 75
If I had only pick one of my rifles to live on it would be my .308 chicom M1A. Heavier than my mini, AK or AR but more confidence inspiring as well. It's the Do-all cartridge. If I can ever afford one of those bullpup conversions for it I'm going to do it and would CQB it in a heartbeat yet still have reach out and touch a MF ability. There's a reason it's still in use in both semi (M1A derivitives etc) and Full auto (240G, minigun, etc) forms. You also don't see any sniper rifles (actually military or police not mall ninja or movie fiction) in .223.

Shameless plug somewhere off the net:

".308 turning cover into concealment since 1952" sums it all up.
H2O MAN likes this.
Slims00ls1z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 19:37   #19
Full Member
Points: 4,028, Level: 40 Points: 4,028, Level: 40 Points: 4,028, Level: 40
Activity: 4.3% Activity: 4.3% Activity: 4.3%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: minnesota , USA
Posts: 43
thinking a 50 is heavy , the 762 comes in nice light 16" AR version that is quite comfortable for even little guys like me
A square 10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2011, 14:34   #20
Full Member
Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 32
I just got a new SA58TAC 16" barrel from DSA. Claimed 8.25 lbs. It's an FAL on a diet.
Airacuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2011, 19:52   #21
Full Member
Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 32
308 rifles too heavy-e41a0072.jpg
Oh Joy! Finally got a pic on all by myself. This is lighter than AR10,M14,HK,etc.
Kicks a bit more than my standard FAL too,about the same as an M14. I LIKE!
Airacuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 06:17   #22
Full Member
Points: 6,656, Level: 53 Points: 6,656, Level: 53 Points: 6,656, Level: 53
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
wolfspotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 249
Originally Posted by Airacuda View Post
Attachment 21185
Oh Joy! Finally got a pic on all by myself. This is lighter than AR10,M14,HK,etc.
Kicks a bit more than my standard FAL too,about the same as an M14. I LIKE!
I like too! Didn't look like a 16" barrel at first. Can you buy those handguards or are they custom made? Had to take a glance at my full length to compare the difference.
wolfspotter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 12:05   #23
Full Member
Points: 2,928, Level: 33 Points: 2,928, Level: 33 Points: 2,928, Level: 33
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 69
I have a short gas system dsa FAL para.

It's surprisingly agile without the weight up front.
Dane17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2011, 17:14   #24
Full Member
Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36 Points: 3,416, Level: 36
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 32
DSA sells the short handguards. There is also a guy named Adam762 I think on the falfiles.com website who can turn your fullsize FAL into a short gas type.
Here's another.
308 rifles too heavy-e41a0073.jpg

Last edited by Airacuda; 11-18-2011 at 17:18. Reason: add picture
Airacuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2011, 11:28   #25
Full Member
Points: 6,320, Level: 51 Points: 6,320, Level: 51 Points: 6,320, Level: 51
Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1% Activity: 1.1%
Last Achievements
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 112
I have a picture of my short-gas fn-Fal in the gallery, since I posted that picture, I have added a DSA scope mount to it. I like the whole short-gas setup so much, I am building a second one that has a heavy barrel profile, I can not wait to get it finished. My only issue is do I want to spend money on a DSA lightweight lower or stick with a steel lower and do I add a scope mount or not.
wonderdog451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
308 rifle, 308 winchester, fn-fal, m-14, m-1a, ptr-91

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:13.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
All information is copyright by Perfectunion.com unless already under copyright.

This site is Gunny Approved