View Full Version : Who Hates Sarah Palin?
According to many in the media, we truly have discovered someone worse than Hitler — and it's Sarah Palin.
Head to any left-wing blog or even CNN for that matter and you'll find the zaniest of conspiracies -- froth that even a dude with rabies would find unseemly.
[/URL][url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,420161,00.html]Link. (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,420161,00.html)
They are so ****ed right now because Obama picked that fool Biden (no idea how a renaissance man like Obama would do that) and McCain picked a total winner.
She scares the **** out of the left because she is everything every feminist wants to be without being a left wing looney...and that scares them.
Pluse she's a HOTTIE.
Pluse....is that French?
stevekaw
09-13-2008, 13:54
Don't hate her...just feel she's unqualified.
Rated as Palin, so would Obama be. Obama was a cog among a hundred cogs for 143 days. Palin oversaw the operation of a state for 2 years. IMO, no worse than par. And Palin is just filling a backup slot.
COBRADOC
09-13-2008, 14:05
Don't hate her...just feel she's unqualified.
And Obama is qulafied?
And Obama is qualified?
Yes.
If you liked the missteps of the Bush administration, you'll love Palin. Maybe that's the problem. Some people refuse to see the devastation Bush &Co. have wrought.
She has direct answers and not trying to speak to be PC!! It her belief and people like her for being a straight shoot, just ask the people that hunt with her.;)
She has never claimed to wanting to live in Chicago and be a community organizer or pull out her semi auto weapon and go gang bang'n!:D
She won't take our guns and likes semi auto weapons!
I'll just mention that her answer to the "Bush Doctrine" question is a non-issue. There are enough real issues that the non-issues should be ignored and not turned into political hay. I observe that the McCain campaign has stooped to the same level as was used against him by Bush operatives in 2000, and in fact many are the same operatives. Most of the non-issues are being raised by the McCain side. What's most astonishing is their willingness to repeat distortions and outright lies in their campaign ads, approved by the so-called "straight talker" himself, and in fact Palin continues to repeat claims proven to be untrue at campaign events. Fortunately, even the sluggish MSM is belatedly beginning to point this out. If they do not press this issue, they will be repeating the same irresponsible failure to investigate and report that that they did in the runup to the invasion of Iraq. The consequence if political claims are allowed to be utterly divorced from reality may turn out to be even more catastrophic in the long run than the mismanagement of the Iraq war. If the public no longer knows or even cares that we are being lied to with impunity, then we will surely find ourselves governed by demagogues.
She has direct answers and not trying to speak to be PC!! It her belief and people like her for being a straight shoot, just ask the people that hunt with her.;)
She has never claimed to wanting to live in Chicago and be a community organizer or pull out her semi auto weapon and go gang bang'n!:D
Well, Obama hasn't threatened to go out with a pistol and go gang-banging either, but he admits to wanting to ban them solely because criminals do. That was enough for me.
Let's not attribute things to the opposition that are untrue. It weakens our arguments and makes it appear short of them, which we are decidedly not.
That question was so imprecise as to be ludicrous. Gibson didn't even know what it was, and the guy that first coined it, Charles Krauthammer, called him on it. ABC is also taking flak from such notables as the NYT for floating such a hit piece. Obama has never been ambushed like that.
AR15_Fanatic
09-13-2008, 16:01
Link. (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,420161,00.html)
I haven't heard anyone in the mainstream media slamming Palin (maybe Keith Olbermann would take a pot shot at her if given a chance). That's the stuff for left-wing internet blogs i.e. Daily Kos, Huffington Post, MoveOn.org, etc. I will say that I have seen several news anchors become agitated when the subject of Palin has come up and they have critiqued her on her foreing policy comments in the Charlie Gibson interview.
Personally I like Palin. She may be a little green but I think she can be a good VP for the country.
Link (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/12/us/politics/12palin.html)
Obama has never been ambushed like that.
Calling that an "ambush" is an exaggeration. I completely agree that not knowing what Gibson meant by "Bush Doctrine" does not indicate lack of knowledge of important foreign policy matters. But that doesn't make it an unfair question.
There are other reasons her interview answers indicated lack of foreign policy knowledge, but that wasn't one of them.
Point is, you can't have it both ways. If you're going to call that question an "ambush," then what do you think a conversation between her and Putin would be like?
Calling that an "ambush" is an exaggeration. I completely agree that not knowing what Gibson meant by "Bush Doctrine" does not indicate lack of knowledge of important foreign policy matters. But that doesn't make it an unfair question.
There are other reasons her interview answers indicated lack of foreign policy knowledge, but that wasn't one of them.
Point is, you can't have it both ways. If you're going to call that question an "ambush," then what do you think a conversation between her and Putin would be like?
About like a conversation between her and Barack Hussein Obama:lol:
I should've said attempted ambush. She handled it well IMO. It was still very shoddy interviewing on Gibson's part. Palin understands Bush's politics better than he does.
And lets skip the worn-out accusations about McCain/Palin and Bush. Nobody runs for president to continue the last guy's presidency, and McCain has a record of being a maverick. Even on issues he agreed with Bush on, he's free to learn from history and change his mind or come up with something better.
Yes.
If you liked the missteps of the Bush administration, you'll love Palin. Maybe that's the problem. Some people refuse to see the devastation Bush &Co. have wrought.
There we go...Bush administration runnin again.:blink:
And lets skip the worn-out accusations about McCain/Palin and Bush. Nobody runs for president to continue the last guy's presidency, and McCain has a record of being a maverick. ...
Worn out? Hardly. With every passing day, we see how McCain conducts himself more and more in the Bush mold. He approves ads just like those the Bush campaign ran against him hin 2000. He totally disregards facts, just like the Bush administration often has. That's not the maverick McCain we once knew. This is the McCain that at some point this year decided that winning was more important than anything else, and that in order to do so he would have to placate the more venal and partisan elements within his party, and he is doing so right now. Bush promised to be a uniter not a divider, but he's been the most divisive president of the last 140 years. McCain has made similar promises, but with the campaign tactics which he has approved, if he is elected there will be more of the same bitter partisanship and every promise he has made to put solving problems before factionalism will be proven false. It's already guaranteed by his signing off on Karl Rove's campaign tactics. McCain has sold out his maverick principles completely.
Obama has been far more consistent throughout his campaign than McCain has.
Free, go ahead and enjoy yourself. We are still deriding Carter, Clinton, LBJ, and countless lesser politicians. You can do the same with Bush. I'm not defending Bush by any means, but anyone who thinks he's particularly evil or particularly the buffoon is kidding himself.
Funny, you change the subject onto something I didn't even say. Can I take that as tacit acknowledgement of the truth of my post?
Obama has been far more consistent throughout his campaign than McCain has.
Other than having to disassociate himself from more unwise associations than McCain has, IIRC.
Funny, you change the subject onto something I didn't even say. Can I take that as tacit acknowledgement of the truth of my post?
You may not.
centurion
09-13-2008, 17:36
A very smart move by McCain to pick Sarah Palin , shes helped energized the Republican party and Idependents and the Hillary voters that does not like Obama , we can see how the Left wing blogs and media are unfairly attacking her and her family and Charlie Gibson with his arrogant way , but the more the Left attacks her the more popular she gets , while they give Obama A free pass , do you think Charlie Gibson would have Treated Obama the same way , we have here A double standard .
Other than having to disassociate himself from more unwise associations than McCain has, IIRC.
Unlike what McCain had to do in order to gain the support of his party's "base," Obama hasn't had to disassociate himself from himself.
:)
Unlike what McCain had to do in order to gain the support of his party's "base," Obama hasn't had to disassociate himself from himself.
:)
Unless he's in a town full of bitter voters with Bibles and guns.
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.