PDA

View Full Version : Obama Nation


freesw
08-13-2008, 22:52
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12526.html

Wild theories of 'Obama Nation' author
By KENNETH P. VOGEL | 8/13/08 7:22 PM EST

The folks behind “The Obama Nation,” the wildly successful but factually disputed new book trashing presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, are casting it as a scholarly, thoroughly researched work.

But its author has left a trail of wild theories, vitriol and dogma that have called into question his credibility.

Jerome Corsi, who rose to prominence as the co-author of a book attacking 2004 Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, penned another tome asserting oil is a nearly infinite resource that continues to generate naturally, and posted a series of online comments through 2004, including suggestions that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lesbian and Muslims worship Satan.

In an interview with Politico, Corsi pointed out that he’s apologized for Internet postings ripping Muslims and Catholics, and said they don’t undermine the integrity of his new book.

“I wrote those to be provocative and I said I would not use that kind of politically incorrect language again, and I don’t believe I have,” he said.

The outrageous allegations haven’t stopped Corsi, who boasts a Ph.D. in political science from Harvard, from achieving mainstream success. The Obama book was published by a new Simon & Schuster imprint that is run by Mary Matalin, a top Republican strategist and media personality.

The New York Times on Wednesday featured an excerpt of the book and a front-page write-up.

The story, though, spent considerable space challenging some of the book’s specific claims, including that Obama has “extensive connections to Islam,” that he never made clear he ceased using drugs after his admitted youthful dabbling and that he sat through a particularly inflammatory 2007 sermon by his former pastor the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Corsi called such challenges “nitpicking and not getting my core argument.”

The book questions whether Obama’s drug use continued into adulthood, Corsi said, because Obama’s assertions to the contrary are “unreliable.” It raises the racially charged rhetoric in a specific Wright sermon because Corsi said it was consistent with the worldview of Obama’s church.

Though he conceded that the conservative blog post from which he got the sermon date may have been wrong, Corsi said he didn’t intend to investigate or issue a correction.

“It’s not a material enough error to have mattered, because it’s a very peripheral point,” he said.

Some of the allegations in Corsi’s attack book on Kerry, “Unfit for Command,” were similarly challenged.

Still, both “Unfit for Command” and “Obama Nation” reached No. 1 on the Times nonfiction best-seller list, highlighting both the lucrative nature of the attack-book genre and the intense interest in all things Obama.

Sales undoubtedly have been boosted by recent appearances on top conservative talk radio shows and Fox News shows, including "Hannity & Colmes."

Corsi is an unabashed partisan. In 2006, he mulled a run for president under the hard-right Constitution Party’s banner and last year he signed on as a senior strategist for a group that intended to become to the right what MoveOn.org is to the left.

But his outrageous assertions and fringe theories — which include allegations that President Bush worked to eliminate the borders with Mexico and Canada and the assertion that Kerry is a Communist — have hurt his credibility on the right, as well.

Corsi’s co-author on the Kerry attack book, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth spokesman John O'Neill, downplayed Corsi’s role after the left-leaning press watchdog group Media Matters exposed Corsi’s venomous postings in the conservative blogosphere.

On the blog FreeRepublic.com, Corsi wrote that pedophilia “is OK with the Pope as long as it isn't reported by the liberal press,” that “RAGHEADS are Boy-Bumpers as clearly as they are Women-Haters” and that Kerry is “Anti-Christian, Anti-American.”

Last year, Corsi released a book charging President Bush was secretly plotting to create a North American Union by merging the U.S. with Canada and Mexico.

The idea that there is a secretive plan for a North American Union is a favorite bogeyman for small-government conservatives but has been derided as baseless by mainstream thinkers and officials.

In blasting Corsi and the theory, a columnist at the influential conservative blog Human Events wrote, “I don't think Corsi is any more worthy of being taken seriously than those who think Jews rule the world or the ‘Truthers’ who think President Bush is responsible for 9/11.”

mnottfam
08-14-2008, 16:01
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=210820

Communist Party USA high on Obama
Chad Groening - OneNewsNow - 8/14/2008 8:00:00 AM

An anti-communist activist is not surprised that the Communist Party USA has written a glowing editorial about Barack Obama. The editorial, titled "Eye on the Prize," was published in the group's official newspaper The People's Weekly World.





According to the editorial, "A broad multiclass, multiracial movement is converging around Obama's 'Hope, change and unity' campaign because they see in it the thrilling opportunity to end 30 years of ultra-right rule and move the nation forward with a progressive movement."



The editorial ended by saying "One thing is clear. None of the people's struggles -- from peace, to universal healthcare, to an economy that puts Main Street before Wall Street -- will advance if McCain wins in November. Let's keep our eyes on the prize."



D.J. McGuire is president of the China e-Lobby. "This is the way CPUSA works. They basically try to hitch a ride on the latest left-wing vehicle and hope it gets them somewhere. It doesn't surprise me [in] the least," he maintains. "I think...the bigger danger is what this tells us in terms of foreign policy more than anything else, because the CPUSA has been very consistently opposed to anything that advances American interests," says McGuire.

The anti-communist activist says if the CPUSA is that happy with Obama, then clearly he is not someone who is willing to advance American interests anywhere -- and therefore should not be given the keys to the White House.

freesw
08-14-2008, 16:13
Wasn't all that long ago that communists openly supported electing the most reactionary politicians on the basis that draconian government and a widened gap between rich and poor would hasten the longed-for revolution.

Nowadays it seems the communists are finally settling for working within the system (as socialists always have) and it's the far right and white supremacists that think an Obama presidency might just usher in the race war they long for.

Do the rest of us really want to tar candidates with their most extreme "supporters"? Obama wouldn't agree with most of the communists' agenda nor vice versa. Just as Ron Paul didn't agree with the white supremacists that supported him, and they didn't agree with his liberty for all agenda.

AZ-Mike
08-14-2008, 16:14
If you want the USA to be a province of the UN, submitting to world opinion and basically being a state in the globally governed world then Obama is a step in the right direction.

This guy is a Marxist. That might be good news for Africa but it's bad news for us. We are the richest country in the world and to a Marxist that means our wealth needs to be siphoned off and given to those with less.

Check out is global poverty act and see how this guy is already allocating 1 trillion of our tax dollars to helping Africa. You think that is a good idea considering we already borrow money from China to pay our yearly budgets? You think it's going to get better if he gets elected POTUS?

If you would like to see the US and its people knocked down a few pegs elect Obama. I am not saying McCain is much better but at least he is not campaigning on the idea that he is going to gut the US economy and give all our stuff away.

mnottfam
08-14-2008, 17:39
If you want the USA to be a province of the UN, submitting to world opinion and basically being a state in the globally governed world then Obama is a step in the right direction.

This guy is a Marxist. That might be good news for Africa but it's bad news for us. We are the richest country in the world and to a Marxist that means our wealth needs to be siphoned off and given to those with less.

Check out is global poverty act and see how this guy is already allocating 1 trillion of our tax dollars to helping Africa. You think that is a good idea considering we already borrow money from China to pay our yearly budgets? You think it's going to get better if he gets elected POTUS?

If you would like to see the US and its people knocked down a few pegs elect Obama. I am not saying McCain is much better but at least he is not campaigning on the idea that he is going to gut the US economy and give all our stuff away.

Why Mike, it almost sounds like you're an isolationist.....SO AM I!!!! We need to pull back and get the heck out of bankrolling the rest of the world at the expense of our entire nation's future.

Anybody here watched the "gumball-immigration" video? Very enlightening. One of the points the gentleman makes is that the Mexicans, despite their immense poverty, are WAY better off than something like 95% of the rest of the world. Why are we so dead set on bankrolling the sadistic leaders of these third world countries that perpetuate the mass poverty of their populations? The reason I bring this up (for those who have trouble connecting the dots) is Mr. Obama's beloved Africa is one of the most impoverished regions of the entire world. The US doesn't have the resources to pull the continent of Africa out of third world status. To even attempt to do so would crush the US economy into making the great depression look like a time of mass-prosperity. Maybe we do need him and his shenanigans to get into the White House. Maybe, just maybe, America would finally wake up and smell the flowers the Democrat party has been planting. The flip side to that coin, though, is that the Republican party needs to quit fielding Bush's and McCain's and start getting SERIOUS with people like Buchanan, Paul (who's now gone indy, I know), Romney, Goldwater (this problem has been around for a long time), Thompson, etc. for the following election. Are Americans smart enough to be able to add the 2+2 together by themselves anymore? I can hope, but I doubt it. I've seen too much stupidity crammed into our kids' heads by our liberal education system to see enough people be able to think for themselves anymore.

A lesson well learned from the Nazis. You control the education of the kids, you control the future. Not that it did THEM any good in the end...

AZ-Mike
08-14-2008, 18:12
I don't know that I am an isolationist, but I am for America first.

Here are a couple of my problems. Do we really need 50,000 pages of documents, 20 working groups, a whole new branch of government etc to buy something another country is selling and vice versa? I don't think so, yet that is exactly what is going on with SPP, NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA etc.

What do you think is in those 50,000 pages? It is a road map for levelling out the laws between the nations etc. READ: Regional Rule. If you doubt that is what is about, look across the pond at the EU. They are separate countries being ruled by a regional union. That is exactly what all these stupid "trade agreements" are going to do here.

Do you think that these agreements are going to give the US any sort of advantage? If you do you should read some of them.

I really don't give a rats ass about Africa or anywhere else but here. The fact that our leaders are worrying MORE about other countries than they are about this country gives me pause (to say the least).

mnottfam
08-14-2008, 18:50
I don't know that I am an isolationist, but I am for America first.

Here are a couple of my problems. Do we really need 50,000 pages of documents, 20 working groups, a whole new branch of government etc to buy something another country is selling and vice versa? I don't think so, yet that is exactly what is going on with SPP, NAFTA, CAFTA, FTAA etc.

What do you think is in those 50,000 pages? It is a road map for levelling out the laws between the nations etc. READ: Regional Rule. If you doubt that is what is about, look across the pond at the EU. They are separate countries being ruled by a regional union. That is exactly what all these stupid "trade agreements" are going to do here.

Do you think that these agreements are going to give the US any sort of advantage? If you do you should read some of them.

I really don't give a rats ass about Africa or anywhere else but here. The fact that our leaders are worrying MORE about other countries than they are about this country gives me pause (to say the least).

Agreed. Take most liberal's favorite subject, Iraq. Yes, Saddam needed to be dealt with, but we should have gone in, kicked butt, and gotten the heck out. Apparently, Jr. didn't learn from daddy's mistake of trusting the Democrats, and allowed us to be shafted into not getting repaid for the massive costs created from liberating their country. Now, we're dumping huge amounts of our $$$ into THAT cesspool, with (thanks to the Democrats and a spineless wimp of a president too gutless to stand up to them) absolutely no way of ever being repaid for it. We've been throwing our hard-earned tax dollars into the coffers of countries that hate our guts for a long time now. Saudi Arabia--our friends? Give me a break. Osama's a member of the royal family, for cryin' out loud, AND they're members of OPEC. Boy, now THERE'S a set of GOOD FRIENDS!!! NOT!!!! Why the sam-hill are we still supporting regimes like this? The old reasoning of supporting them or the Soviets will get to them is gone (more than likely, anyway--I think the situation in Georgia is a little blip on the windscreen), and don't give me that--"They're Bush's buddies" garbage--Every president going back many decades has been supporting these tin-pot dictators, Democrat and Republican alike. When will it end? Only when we start standing up to our govt and demanding accountability from them. Socialists don't like that, though.

AZ-Mike
08-14-2008, 19:40
It is the old refrain for me: "Liberals believe communism (or socialism) failed in the past because they weren't in charge".

The system (socialism) can never work because it rewards people who are unproductive and punishes those that are. It has never worked any other place than Star Trek and other Sci-Fi, make believe places.

I was always under the impression that it was the definition of insanity to continue to the do the same thing over and over expecting to get a different result. Apparently liberals have "redefined" insanity the way to redefine everything else.

freesw
08-14-2008, 20:58
Apparently, Jr. didn't learn from daddy's mistake of trusting the Democrats, and allowed us to be shafted into not getting repaid for the massive costs created from liberating their country. Now, we're dumping huge amounts of our $$$ into THAT cesspool, with (thanks to the Democrats and a spineless wimp of a president too gutless to stand up to them) absolutely no way of ever being repaid for it. We've been throwing our hard-earned tax dollars into the coffers of countries that hate our guts for a long time now.

So the Iraq debt is now the Democrats' fault? Bush has rolled over for them? Please. Congress has given Bush everything he's wanted in regards to Iraq. The Bush administration has set the agenda in Iraq from start to now.

mnottfam
08-15-2008, 07:41
Apparently, SW, you missed the bit with the Democrats accusing Mr. Bush of invading Iraq for their oil, and getting him to basically state publicly that we're not going to use their oil to repay the expenses from their liberation. His daddy's big mistake was getting elected under the "read my lips..." As soon as he got into office, the Democrats shoved a tax bill under his nose and said, "sign this, or we won't work with you at all during your presidency." He was dumb enough to trust the Democrats to work with him after signing THEIR tax bill, which had them running to the MSM screaming, "SEE!! He raised your taxes!! Never mind that WE'RE THE ONES WHO WROTE THE TAX BILL!!! WE CONNED HIM INTO SIGNING IT!!" Oh well. Like father, like son.<_<