PDA

View Full Version : Another One Bites The Dust


Boogyman
10-13-2006, 10:58
Rep. Ney pleads guilty in lobbying scandal

Could get 27 months to 10 years in prison at January 19th sentencing

Bill Haber / AP file
Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, has become the first member of congress to plead guilty in the Capitol Hill lobbying scandal probe.

Updated: 1 hour ago
WASHINGTON - Rep. Bob Ney pleaded guilty Friday to bribery charges stemming from the Jack Abramoff influence-peddling investigation.

The Ohio Republican was the first member of Congress convicted in the scandal that has tainted the White House as well as Capitol Hill. He faces up to 10 years in prison.

Ney confessed his wrongdoing before U.S. District Judge Ellen S. Huvelle in a federal courthouse a few blocks distant from the Capitol, where until recently he wielded a chairman's gavel.

The Ohio Republican did not speak to reporters as he made his way into the courthouse. It was his first public appearance since entering an alcohol treatment program last month.

Inside the courtroom, Huvelle spent nearly a half-hour asking the sandy-haired, red-faced congressman a series of questions about whether he understood the charges and agreed that he had taken money, gifts and favors in return for official actions on behalf of Abramoff and his clients.

At the end she asked him how he pleaded to the conspiracy count, he replied, "I plead guilty your honor."

Huvelle said that while the maximum penalty is 10 years in prison and $500,000 in fines, the government had agreed to recommend a penalty of 27 months in prison.

She added that federal guidelines suggest a fine between $5,000 and $60,000.

Mark Touhey, Ney's lawyer, told the judge the congressman would resign from office before sentencing on Jan. 19. Ney's term in Congress expires before then, though, at noon on Jan 3.

Touhey also asked for Ney to be incarcerated in a facility that has an alcohol treatment program.

Ney is out on bond until his sentencing. He can travel within the United States.

Change of direction
Ney had consistently denied any wrongdoing in the investigation, an insistence that he maintained even after his former chief of staff pleaded guilty in May. The aide, Neil Volz, confessed to conspiring to corrupt the congressman and others with trips and other aid. Volz became a business partner of Abramoff after leaving the congressional payroll.

Ney had a unique power perch in the House when the year dawned, as chairman of the committee with jurisdiction over the internal workings of the 435-member House. Speaker Dennis Hastert pressured Ney into surrendering his committee chairmanship earlier this year as concern rippled through the GOP ranks about the Abramoff scandal.

Still, as recently as early summer, Ney said he intended to seek re-election in the sprawling, rural district in eastern Ohio he has represented since 1994. He changed his mind at the prodding of party leaders who feared the loss of his seat in November if he remained on the ballot.

Abramoff convenient incarceration
Just after the mid-term elections, on Nov. 15, disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff will report to federal prison on his own guilty pleas relating to the Florida based SunCruz casino scandal.

Prosecutors and Abramoff's lawyer, Abbe Lowell, in a joint motion, have asked a federal judge to recommend that Abramoff serve his 70-month sentence at the federal correctional facility in Cumberland, Maryland.

The request to Judge Paul Huck says that Abramoff's cooperation in the pay-to-play, influence peddling investigation is still crucial and, "will continue after he is incarcerated," according to the motion filed yesterday.

Abramoff and his partner Adam Kidan pleaded guilty to defrauding lenders of more than $60 million in the SunCruz gambling casino scandal in Florida. Abramoff, who has been sentenced to more than five-years in prison for his SunCruz plea is awaiting sentencing in the Washington influence peddling scandal. He will serve both sentences concurrently.

The court filing states that Cumberland facility is within driving distance of Washington and Mr. Abramoff's incarceration there, "will facilitate the government's access to him and, therefore, the ongoing investigation." The motion also suggests that the proximity to Washington would help prosecutors reduce costs and travel time.

Weeks ago in another court filing, prosecutors and Abramoff's lawyer, asked a Judge Huck to delay Abramoff's prison term for three-months saying reporting to jail earlier, "would significantly impede on-going investigations in which his participation is critical." The judge expressed at a hearing exasperation with the slow pace of the Washington investigation and advised attorneys not to expect any further extensions.

If there is a problem accommodation Abramoff in the Cumberland facility, an alternative was suggested in the filing, the federal correctional facility in Morgantown, West Virginia, which, "is also within driving distance of Washington, D.C.," according to the court papers.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15249272/

freesw
10-13-2006, 18:21
The stench from Republican K Street and Congress is overpowering:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/12/AR2006101200889_pf.html

Friday, October 13, 2006; 1:32 AM

Five conservative nonprofit organizations, including one run by prominent Republican Grover Norquist, "appear to have perpetrated a fraud" on taxpayers by selling their clout to lobbyist Jack Abramoff, Senate investigators said in a report issued yesterday.

The report includes previously unreleased e-mails between the now-disgraced lobbyist and officers of the nonprofit groups, showing that Abramoff funneled money from his clients to the groups. In exchange, the groups, among other things, produced ostensibly independent newspaper op-ed columns or news releases that favored the clients' positions.

Officers of the groups "were generally available to carry out Mr. Abramoff's requests for help with his clients in exchange for cash payments," said the report, issued by the Senate Finance Committee. The report was written by the Democratic staff after a yearlong investigation and authorized by the Republican chairman, Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa).
... The investigation has resulted in one conviction and seven guilty pleas -- including one from a lawmaker, Rep. Robert W. Ney (R-Ohio), who is to appear today before a federal judge in the District.

The Senate report released yesterday states that the nonprofit groups probably violated their tax-exempt status "by laundering payments and then disbursing funds at Mr. Abramoff's direction; taking payments in exchange for writing newspaper columns or press releases that put Mr. Abramoff's clients in a favorable light; introducing Mr. Abramoff's clients to government officials in exchange for payment; and agreeing to act as a front organization for congressional trips paid for by Mr. Abramoff's clients."

The report bolstered earlier revelations that Abramoff laundered money through the nonprofits to pay for congressional trips and paid Norquist to arrange meetings for Abramoff's clients with government officials including White House senior adviser Karl Rove.

The groups named in the report are Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform; the Council of Republicans for Environmental Advocacy, which was co-founded by Norquist and Gale Norton before she became secretary of the interior; Citizens Against Government Waste; the National Center for Public Policy Research, a spinoff of the Heritage Foundation; and Toward Tradition, a Seattle-based religious group founded by Rabbi Daniel Lapin.

E-mails released by the committee show that Abramoff, often with the knowledge of the groups' leaders, exploited the tax-exempt status and leveraged the stature of the organizations to build support among conservatives for legislation or government action sought by clients including Microsoft Corp., mutual fund company DH2 Inc., Primedia Inc.'s Channel One Network, and Brown-Forman, maker of Jack Daniel's whiskey.
...

The Abramoff scandal has bruised the image of Norquist, a friend of Abramoff's since their days in the College Republicans. Often consulted by Rove, Norquist for decades has convened a key Wednesday morning strategy session for conservative leaders, lobbyists and Republican lawmakers.

Abramoff traded on Norquist's cachet, at one point referring to him in an e-mail as a "hard-won asset" of his lobbying empire. In exchange for Norquist's opposition to taxes on Brown-Forman products, Norquist recommended that a $50,000 donation be made to Americans for Tax Reform, according to an Abramoff e-mail.

"What is most important, however, is that this matter is kept discreet," Abramoff wrote to a colleague at the Preston, Gates & Ellis law firm. "We do not want the opponents to think that we are trying to buy the taxpayer movement."

The e-mails show that Abramoff and Norquist explicitly discussed client donations to Norquist's group in exchange for Norquist's support. The group's advocacy "appears indistinguishable from lobbying undertaken by for-profit, taxable firms," the report said.

Among those who agreed to donate money for an opinion piece was DH2, which in 2004 pushed for tax breaks for its customers.

E-mails show that DH2 understood that Norquist's help came with a price tag. The tab was sent to DH2's managing director, Robert S. Rubin.

"I told Rubin he needs to round up some $$$ for ATR," wrote lobbyist Michael E. Williams to his boss, Abramoff.

"Get the money from Rubin in hand," Abramoff replied, "and then we'll call Grover."

How much, Williams asked.

"50K," Abramoff wrote.

Abramoff e-mailed Norquist on Feb. 10, 2004: "I have sent over a $50K contribution from DH2 (the mutual fund client). Any sense as to where we are on the op-ed placement?"

Replied Norquist: "The Wash Times told me they were running the piece. . . . I will nudge again."

The Washington Times has published about 50 Norquist op-eds since 1993 but apparently none on mutual funds. Norquist did write a letter in April 2004 to a congressman praising him for sponsoring "legislation that would finally allow mutual fund shareholders to defer their capital gains tax" and pledging that his group "is committed to helping you pass this legislation."

Norquist wrote an op-ed piece, published in the Washington Times, as part of an extensive Abramoff campaign for Channel One, which broadcasts educational programming and advertising into public school classrooms. An Abramoff e-mail to Norquist offered him $1,500 for an op-ed, and another e-mail exchange suggested up to $3,000 to buy an "economic analysis."
...

Hoodoo
10-22-2006, 09:39
The sooner the crooked politicians are out of Office the better. Now if the spotlight will only turn on those in BOTH Parties things will get a lot better.

josh
10-22-2006, 09:54
The sooner the crooked politicians are out of Office the better. Now if the spotlight will only turn on those in BOTH Parties things will get a lot better.

Exactly. It would be nice to have some honest representation.

Boogyman
10-22-2006, 10:18
The sooner the crooked politicians are out of Office the better. Now if the spotlight will only turn on those in BOTH Parties things will get a lot better.
If you don't think the Republicans aren't clawing at the ground looking for dirt on the Democrats, you're naive.

If there was anything there, you better believe we'd be hearing about it.

The Republicans would do a lot better if they spent that much energy fixing their own party instead of trying to tear down the other guys.

Hoodoo
10-23-2006, 20:24
Yep, I suspect they are and Democrats are hunting deep cover. Undoubtedly the Dems are responsible for bringing to light the current scandals-not saying that they shouldn't. On the other hand they shouldn't squawk and complain when the favor is returned. I am in faver of getting all of the crooks and perverts regardless of Party affiliation.

Olds
10-23-2006, 22:03
Exactly. It would be nice to have some honest representation.

I agree.....

jwp
10-30-2006, 05:27
If you don't think the Republicans aren't clawing at the ground looking for dirt on the Democrats, you're naive.

If there was anything there, you better believe we'd be hearing about it.

The Republicans would do a lot better if they spent that much energy fixing their own party instead of trying to tear down the other guys.

oh - like teddy kennedy who should have a manslaughter conviction is a shining democrap example?

ymmv

Boogyman
10-30-2006, 08:10
oh - like teddy kennedy who should have a manslaughter conviction is a shining democrap example?

ymmv
Huh??? That was decades ago. WTF? That's all you got? :rolleyes:

Gawd I'm so sick of people dredging up ancient crap and expecting us to recognize it as a valid point.

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NOW.

What if I start dragging Nixon out and throwing him around... stupid! :o

cma g21
10-30-2006, 08:38
If you don't think the Republicans aren't clawing at the ground looking for dirt on the Democrats, you're naive.

If there was anything there, you better believe we'd be hearing about it.

The Republicans would do a lot better if they spent that much energy fixing their own party instead of trying to tear down the other guys.

I'd be surprised if the Democrats were, at this time, engaged in anywhere near the current Republican level of influence peddling. In case you haven't noticed, it's been years since the Democrats controlled either the White House or Congress.

I can't believe you don't realize they'll be at least as corrupt once they're back in power.

As to all the energy spent, "...trying to tear down the other guys...," that's at least as big a problem for the Democrats as the Republicans.

cma g21
10-30-2006, 08:49
Huh??? That was decades ago. WTF? That's all you got? :rolleyes:

Gawd I'm so sick of people dredging up ancient crap and expecting us to recognize it as a valid point.

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NOW.

What if I start dragging Nixon out and throwing him around... stupid! :o

I have to disagree with you here.

Nixon is out of office (not to mention dead). Teddy is a sitting Senator,"NOW.".

I do think there are a lot better issues to use if someone wants to criticize Kennedy. Still, as long as he still holds office, how can you say bringing up this issue is not valid?

Boogyman
10-30-2006, 08:50
I can't believe you don't realize they'll be at least as corrupt once they're back in power.
You shouldn't "assume" what I do or do not "realize"...

From another thread:
The Republicans are corrupt because they've been in control of everything for too long.

If the Democrats end up controlling everything for too long, the same thing will happen to them.

The trick is to keep a balance of power. That's what the Founders intended.

Boogyman
10-30-2006, 09:00
how can you say bringing up this issue is not valid?
How can you say it is?

What does Kennedy have to do with all the scandals and investigations for corruption and perversion that the Republican party is currently involved in?

Is Kennedy currently under investigation for something I don't know about?

How does bringing up ancient history about Kennedy's car wreck add anything at all to a debate about current corruption in our government?

Why don't you address the problems we are facing, all of us Americans, right now, instead of weakly trying to "justify" your party's afflictions by dredging up something a Democrat was involved in decades ago?

Rather pointless, isn't it?

cma g21
10-30-2006, 09:44
Originally Posted by Boogyman
The Republicans are corrupt because they've been in control of everything for too long.

If the Democrats end up controlling everything for too long, the same thing will happen to them.

The trick is to keep a balance of power. That's what the Founders intended.

I agree balance is good, in all things (a pity it's so rare). :rolleyes:

Power corrupts! IMHO, it's best to limit how much one party has. I don't think having either party in control of Senate, House, and Presidency is a good thing.

Giving (nearly) complete power to one party, then another seem less like a balance, and more like a roller-coaster of extremes.