PDA

View Full Version : Former white house employee claims GOP elites played religious right


freesw
10-12-2006, 10:00
By Jonathan Larsen
"Countdown" producer
MSNBC
Updated: 7:57 p.m. CT Oct 11, 2006

More than five years after President Bush created the Office of Faith-Based Initiatives, the former second-in-command of that office is going public with an insider’s tell-all account that portrays an office used almost exclusively to win political points with both evangelical Christians and traditionally Democratic minorities.

The office’s primary mission, providing financial support to charities that serve the poor, never got the presidential support it needed to succeed, according to the book.

Entitled “Tempting Faith,” the book is not scheduled for release until Oct. 16, but MSNBC’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” has obtained a copy.

“Tempting Faith’s” author is David Kuo, who served as special assistant to the president from 2001 to 2003. A self-described conservative Christian, Kuo’s previous experience includes work for prominent conservatives including former Education Secretary and federal drug czar Bill Bennett and former Attorney General John Ashcroft.

Kuo, who has complained publicly in the past about the funding shortfalls, goes several steps further in his new book.

He says some of the nation’s most prominent evangelical leaders were known in the office of presidential political strategist Karl Rove as “the nuts.”

“National Christian leaders received hugs and smiles in person and then were dismissed behind their backs and described as ‘ridiculous,’ ‘out of control,’ and just plain ‘goofy,’” Kuo writes.

More seriously, Kuo alleges that then-White House political affairs director Ken Mehlman knowingly participated in a scheme to use the office, and taxpayer funds, to mount ostensibly “nonpartisan” events that were, in reality, designed with the intent of mobilizing religious voters in 20 targeted races.

According to Kuo, “Ken loved the idea and gave us our marching orders.”

Among those marching orders, Kuo says, was Mehlman’s mandate to conceal the true nature of the events.

Kuo quotes Mehlman as saying, “… (I)t can’t come from the campaigns. That would make it look too political. It needs to come from the congressional offices. We’ll take care of that by having our guys call the office [of faith-based initiatives] to request the visit.”

Nineteen out of the 20 targeted races were won by Republicans, Kuo reports. The outreach was so extensive and so powerful in motivating not just conservative evangelicals, but also traditionally Democratic minorities, that Kuo attributes Bush’s 2004 Ohio victory “at least partially … to the conferences we had launched two years before.”

With the exception of one reporter from the Washington Post, Kuo says the media were oblivious to the political nature and impact of his office’s events, in part because so much of the debate centered on issues of separation of church and state.

In fact, the Bush administration often promoted the faith-based agenda by claiming that existing government regulations were too restrictive on religious organizations seeking to serve the public.

Substantiating that claim proved difficult, Kuo says. “Finding these examples became a huge priority.… If President Bush was making the world a better place for faith-based groups, we had to show it was really a bad place to begin with. But, in fact, it wasn’t that bad at all.”

In fact, when Bush asks Kuo how much money was being spent on “compassion” social programs, Kuo claims he discovered “we were actually spending about $20 million a year less on them than before he had taken office.”

The money that was appropriated and disbursed, however, often served a political agenda, Kuo claims.

“Many of the grant-winning organizations that rose to the top of the process were politically friendly to the administration,” he says.

More pointedly, Kuo quotes an unnamed member of the review panel charged with rating grant applications.

“But,” she said with a giggle, ‘When I saw one of those non-Christian groups in the set I was reviewing, I just stopped looking at them and gave them a zero … a lot of us did.’”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15228489/#storyContinued

Hoodoo
10-22-2006, 09:37
Jeez, what a revelation. Is Bush the only politicain to play for votes from the religious right? Guess no one has ever courted the political Left or any other special interest group. SHEESH.

Boogyman
10-22-2006, 10:27
Jeez, what a revelation. Is Bush the only politicain to play for votes from the religious right? Guess no one has ever courted the political Left or any other special interest group. SHEESH.
So by your "logic", because you think everyone does it makes it OK?

Funny, when dirt on Republicans is exposed, then it's "So what? Everybody does it."

Yet we're still hearing about Clinton's BJ.

You've never had a BJ? :lol:

Hoodoo
10-23-2006, 20:20
Are you always so quick to jump to totally unfounded conclusions? Where did I say that it was OK? All I tried to point out was the hypocrisy of accusing one Party doing something one's own Party is equally guilty of.

markw76
10-23-2006, 23:36
Sounds like the stuff I read about in PoliSci class in high school (1968-1973). Same crap, different target group.

Boogyman
10-24-2006, 01:48
Are you always so quick to jump to totally unfounded conclusions? Where did I say that it was OK? All I tried to point out was the hypocrisy of accusing one Party doing something one's own Party is equally guilty of.
Show me what the Democrats are "equally" guilty of.

"Totally unfounded conclusions"?

:lol: :lol: :lol:

BTW, FYI I'm not a Democrat.

markw76
10-24-2006, 02:06
I try to be engaging and all they do is argue around me at each other. I'm not appreciated...:rolleyes:

josh
10-24-2006, 05:08
While I believe groups such as churches are much more efficient at charitable causes Im not a fan of them receiving govt money.

It has nothing to do with the imaginary "wall of seperation" but rather govt control. The feds have controlle the states by giving them money with conditions attached. How long until this faith based money is used the same way. To control religous institutions. We already have preachers afraid to mention anything remotely political lest they lose their tex exempt status.
Unless you are a church Al Gore campaigns in then it is alright because it is different for liberals.

Boogyman
10-24-2006, 09:44
I try to be engaging and all they do is argue around me at each other. I'm not appreciated...:rolleyes:
Yeah, you are... ;)

I like your new avatar, too! :lol:

freesw
10-24-2006, 17:50
Just now listened to Ray Suarez of PBS interview David Kuo on the News Hour. Found Kuo to be very credible. Once again, though I can hardly believe the Bush administration could be more contemptible, it is. My stomach is knotted in anger at those pious frauds.

markw76
10-24-2006, 22:23
The fact that the Republicans had a chance to avoid sliding too far left and avoiding all this, and failed, is like twisting the knife. And we took the Democraps to task for not being principled. :angry:

Hoodoo
10-26-2006, 06:06
Well, let's consider the fact that the Dems play the Blacks, Hispanics and every other "minority" race for their votes. They sponser endless Legislation to get the votes of these groups.. fAct is that both Parties do everything in their power to get the votes of everyone they can. You well know this. If one side is wrong, they both are. Far as I,m concerned both Parties are totally worthless. Let's just tell it like it is though.

markw76
10-26-2006, 09:38
Where the heck did the wisdom go that if a politician's mouth was moving, you were being lied to. I thought it was a given!