BlenderWizard
09-25-2006, 07:26
I know I've posted this here before, but this is just to refresh everyone's memory:
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a5/BlenderWizard/guns/johnlewis.jpg
Now, here's his latest response to my email pertaining to HR 503:
Dear John:
Thank you for contacting to voice your concern regarding H.R.503, an amendment to the Horse Protection Act. I appreciate hearing from you and I value your opinion on this matter.
H.R.503 was introduced by Rep. John E. Sweeney (R-NY). The bill was passed on September 7, 2006. I was one of 263 Members of Congress to vote in support of this important piece of legislation. I believe that the inhumane treatment of animals needs to end, and this bill takes the correct steps to ending mistreatment of horses.
This bill amends the Horse Protection Act to prohibit the shipping, transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing, selling, or donation of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for human consumption. Additionally, the Secretary of Agriculture has the capability to seize a horse in order to test and/or evaluate the horse in regards to its treatment and the handling of the horse. The Secretary of Agriculture would evaluate whether or not the horse is being treated in such a way that violates the given law in regards to purchasing, shipping, selling, transporting, and even possessing horses for personal human consumption.
Again, thank you for weighing in on this issue and please continue to contact me on other issues of concern to you. Also, please visit my website at http:///www.house.gov.johnlewis/ for more information.
Sincerely,
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a5/BlenderWizard/JL_sig.jpg
John Lewis
Member of Congress
I HAD to send this idiot a response to his email:
The bottom line on this issue is that the horses were not being treated inhumanely. This was a "feel good" measure pushed through by horse owners so that the government would subsidize euthanizing the animals, and the horse owners wouldn't have to feel bad that they sent their horses in for slaughter when the time came (reference section 11 of HR 503 for this).
There is nothing wrong with humans consuming horse meat, and there never has been; humans have consumed horses for as long as the two have coexisted.
This bill is just another way the government is infringing on the rights of its people.
I challenge you, and others in your position to actually read and understand what you are voting on, as you have demonstrated, again, in this situation thet you neither read nor fully comprehend everything you vote on.
Thanks,
Unfortunately, his mail server would not accept this email from me
I mean, if someone wants to eat a horse, by God, they should be able to eat a horse.
I also saw that he voted to give himself a raise recently, which did not pass.
This guy is genuine garbage, and has been GA's 5th district congressman since 1989.
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a5/BlenderWizard/guns/johnlewis.jpg
Now, here's his latest response to my email pertaining to HR 503:
Dear John:
Thank you for contacting to voice your concern regarding H.R.503, an amendment to the Horse Protection Act. I appreciate hearing from you and I value your opinion on this matter.
H.R.503 was introduced by Rep. John E. Sweeney (R-NY). The bill was passed on September 7, 2006. I was one of 263 Members of Congress to vote in support of this important piece of legislation. I believe that the inhumane treatment of animals needs to end, and this bill takes the correct steps to ending mistreatment of horses.
This bill amends the Horse Protection Act to prohibit the shipping, transporting, moving, delivering, receiving, possessing, purchasing, selling, or donation of horses and other equines to be slaughtered for human consumption. Additionally, the Secretary of Agriculture has the capability to seize a horse in order to test and/or evaluate the horse in regards to its treatment and the handling of the horse. The Secretary of Agriculture would evaluate whether or not the horse is being treated in such a way that violates the given law in regards to purchasing, shipping, selling, transporting, and even possessing horses for personal human consumption.
Again, thank you for weighing in on this issue and please continue to contact me on other issues of concern to you. Also, please visit my website at http:///www.house.gov.johnlewis/ for more information.
Sincerely,
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a5/BlenderWizard/JL_sig.jpg
John Lewis
Member of Congress
I HAD to send this idiot a response to his email:
The bottom line on this issue is that the horses were not being treated inhumanely. This was a "feel good" measure pushed through by horse owners so that the government would subsidize euthanizing the animals, and the horse owners wouldn't have to feel bad that they sent their horses in for slaughter when the time came (reference section 11 of HR 503 for this).
There is nothing wrong with humans consuming horse meat, and there never has been; humans have consumed horses for as long as the two have coexisted.
This bill is just another way the government is infringing on the rights of its people.
I challenge you, and others in your position to actually read and understand what you are voting on, as you have demonstrated, again, in this situation thet you neither read nor fully comprehend everything you vote on.
Thanks,
Unfortunately, his mail server would not accept this email from me
I mean, if someone wants to eat a horse, by God, they should be able to eat a horse.
I also saw that he voted to give himself a raise recently, which did not pass.
This guy is genuine garbage, and has been GA's 5th district congressman since 1989.