PDA

View Full Version : Giving Terrorists What They Want


freesw
08-27-2006, 11:00
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/08/what_the_terror.html

Schneier on Security

A weblog covering security and security technology.

August 24, 2006
What the Terrorists Want

On Aug. 16, two men were escorted off a plane headed for Manchester, England, because some passengers thought they looked either Asian or Middle Eastern, might have been talking Arabic, wore leather jackets, and looked at their watches -- and the passengers refused to fly with them on board. The men were questioned for several hours and then released.

On Aug. 15, an entire airport terminal was evacuated because someone's cosmetics triggered a false positive for explosives. The same day, a Muslim man was removed from an airplane in Denver for reciting prayers. The Transportation Security Administration decided that the flight crew overreacted, but he still had to spend the night in Denver before flying home the next day. The next day, a Port of Seattle terminal was evacuated because a couple of dogs gave a false alarm for explosives.

On Aug. 19, a plane made an emergency landing in Tampa, Florida, after the crew became suspicious because two of the lavatory doors were locked. The plane was searched, but nothing was found. Meanwhile, a man who tampered with a bathroom smoke detector on a flight to San Antonio was cleared of terrorism, but only after having his house searched.

On Aug. 16, a woman suffered a panic attack and became violent on a flight from London to Washington, so the plane was escorted to the Boston airport by fighter jets. "The woman was carrying hand cream and matches but was not a terrorist threat," said the TSA spokesman after the incident.

And on Aug. 18, a plane flying from London to Egypt made an emergency landing in Italy when someone found a bomb threat scrawled on an air sickness bag. Nothing was found on the plane, and no one knows how long the note was on board.

I'd like everyone to take a deep breath and listen for a minute.

The point of terrorism is to cause terror, sometimes to further a political goal and sometimes out of sheer hatred. The people terrorists kill are not the targets; they are collateral damage. And blowing up planes, trains, markets or buses is not the goal; those are just tactics. The real targets of terrorism are the rest of us: the billions of us who are not killed but are terrorized because of the killing. The real point of terrorism is not the act itself, but our reaction to the act.

And we're doing exactly what the terrorists want.

We're all a little jumpy after the recent arrest of 23 terror suspects in Great Britain. The men were reportedly plotting a liquid-explosive attack on airplanes, and both the press and politicians have been trumpeting the story ever since.

In truth, it's doubtful that their plan would have succeeded; chemists have been debunking the idea since it became public. Certainly the suspects were a long way off from trying: None had bought airline tickets, and some didn't even have passports.

Regardless of the threat, from the would-be bombers' perspective, the explosives and planes were merely tactics. Their goal was to cause terror, and in that they've succeeded.

Imagine for a moment what would have happened if they had blown up 10 planes. There would be canceled flights, chaos at airports, bans on carry-on luggage, world leaders talking tough new security measures, political posturing and all sorts of false alarms as jittery people panicked. To a lesser degree, that's basically what's happening right now.

Our politicians help the terrorists every time they use fear as a campaign tactic. The press helps every time it writes scare stories about the plot and the threat. And if we're terrified, and we share that fear, we help. All of these actions intensify and repeat the terrorists' actions, and increase the effects of their terror.

(I am not saying that the politicians and press are terrorists, or that they share any of the blame for terrorist attacks. I'm not that stupid. But the subject of terrorism is more complex than it appears, and understanding its various causes and effects are vital for understanding how to best deal with it.)

The implausible plots and false alarms actually hurt us in two ways. Not only do they increase the level of fear, but they also waste time and resources that could be better spent fighting the real threats and increasing actual security. I'll bet the terrorists are laughing at us.

Another thought experiment: Imagine for a moment that the British government arrested the 23 suspects without fanfare. Imagine that the TSA and its European counterparts didn't engage in pointless airline-security measures like banning liquids. And imagine that the press didn't write about it endlessly, and that the politicians didn't use the event to remind us all how scared we should be. If we'd reacted that way, then the terrorists would have truly failed.

It's time we calm down and fight terror with antiterror. This does not mean that we simply roll over and accept terrorism. There are things our government can and should do to fight terrorism, most of them involving intelligence and investigation -- and not focusing on specific plots.

But our job is to remain steadfast in the face of terror, to refuse to be terrorized. Our job is to not panic every time two Muslims stand together checking their watches. There are approximately 1 billion Muslims in the world, a large percentage of them not Arab, and about 320 million Arabs in the Middle East, the overwhelming majority of them not terrorists. Our job is to think critically and rationally, and to ignore the cacophony of other interests trying to use terrorism to advance political careers or increase a television show's viewership.

The surest defense against terrorism is to refuse to be terrorized. Our job is to recognize that terrorism is just one of the risks we face, and not a particularly common one at that. And our job is to fight those politicians who use fear as an excuse to take away our liberties and promote security theater that wastes money and doesn't make us any safer.

This essay originally appeared on Wired.com.

EDITED TO ADD (3/24): Here's another incident:

All 12 passengers arrested after a US airliner returned to Amsterdam will be released, Dutch prosecutors say.

Northwest Airlines flight 42, bound for Mumbai (Bombay) in India, changed course over Germany and flew back to Schiphol airport on Wednesday.

The 12 men, said to be of Asian appearance, reportedly aroused suspicion by fiddling with mobile phones and plastic bags.

US air marshals apprehended them before the pilot diverted the flight.

Two Dutch F-16 fighter jets escorted it back to Schiphol.

-----

And from dailykos:

by Bill in Portland Maine
Fri Aug 25, 2006 at 06:18:07 AM PDT

From the GREAT STATE OF MAINE...

What the Terrorists Want

I lived for 5 years in Dusseldorf, Germany in the late 70s when I was just a li'l nipper. Terrorism was a fact of life there and throughout Europe. The police carried machine guns, bombs went off, people were kidnapped or killed...and LIFE WENT ON.

Terrorism wasn't politicized---it was just dealt with. People were neither scared nor told to be scared (and they sure as hell weren't told to "go shopping" to ease their minds). ...

------

I truly believe that Al Qaeda and the Bush administration have become symbiotic - they need each other. The Bush administration's policies help Al Qaeda recruitment, and in return, Bin Laden gave Bush an endorsement right before the 2004 election (of course it was a condemnation, which for the American public, served perfectly as an endorsement). The Bush administration, big government Republicans all, were given an unprecedented opportunity to implement anti-democratic measures in this country that they could only dream of prior to 9/11. Sure, they hate each others' guts, but it's an obviously mutually beneficial animosity.

DaveyDug
08-27-2006, 12:09
You're absolutely right, freesw. This is something I've been saying for a long time. The terrorists' plan has succeeded probably beyond their expectations. We live in a completely different country since 9-11, and that's just what they wanted. I, for one, refuse to live my life any differently than I did before 9-11. This country's knee-jerk reactions to the terrorist attack along with the subsequent law and policy changes that continue to accompany it make me want to puke.

Osama, with the help of the Bush administration and the media, has not only terrorized the populace of this nation, he has also (probably irreversibly) revoked many of our freedoms and liberties. I'm sure he's laughing his ass off at that very thought.

josh
08-27-2006, 16:00
I am vehemently opposed to most of our reactions to terrorist attacks since 911. The liberty robbed of us by Bush administration policies to keep us safe is far greater than the Clinton administration was ever able to accomplish.

I have supported fighting them militarily in their own back yard to preserve our nation . But at this point in time our republic had been destroyed so badly from within I dont know that it is worth preserving.

You really want to fight terror start in washington.

Hoodoo
08-28-2006, 06:27
That Article is right on target. We have a far greater chance of being terrorized by our own Government than by outsiders. Parts of the Constitution have already been sacked as an excuse to "protect" us. If that is the price, I don't want to be protected.

The Homeland "Defense" effort is being primarily to spread huge sums of money among the States mostly without regard to which are to most likely targets of a Terrorist atack. Montana is a beautiful state, but wwhat in the hey would a Terrorist attack there? ditto most of the STates. This is simply a political grab bag.

tri70
08-28-2006, 08:38
It just goes to show it is the west job to police the world. If they banned all muslims from flying into the west, then the muslim countries may do something about terrorism and save us alot of trouble and money.

-tri

jwp
08-28-2006, 23:04
agreed, they won after 9/11 by making us change our lifestyle

police state here we come

Boogyman
08-28-2006, 23:32
agreed, they won after 9/11 by making us change our lifestyle

police state here we come

Lifestyle? That's it?

Glad you can be so blase' while our Constitution is being gutted... :wacko:

jwp
08-28-2006, 23:38
Lifestyle? That's it?

Glad you can be so blase' while our Constitution is being gutted... :wacko:

well we did or allowed it to be done to ourselves so in the parlance roll over and enjoy it or fix it

afaik the politicians won't fix it so......................... bohica

Boogyman
08-29-2006, 08:50
well we did or allowed it to be done to ourselves so in the parlance roll over and enjoy it or fix it

afaik the politicians won't fix it so......................... bohica
Well, you can "bohica" if you like, but don't criticize others for trying to do something about it, no matter how small a contribution they make.

What do you think all these threads and posts are about? Debate is educational. Raises awareness. Pulls people's heads out of the sand.

There's nothing more American than citizens gathered together, engaged in spirited debate. Brings to mind our Founders, in a room back in the late 1700's, taking turns orating and pounding their fists on the podium, slowly but steadfastedly coming together and forging a new, free nation.

Now we do that on forums like this. Or at least we try.

I've learned more about my country, my government, and the elected officials in it by discussing and debating here on the internet than I have on the news channels.

Searching and googling the net for info to back up an argument, or dipute someone else's, you tend to pick up a lot of stuff.

Knowledge is power.

josh
08-29-2006, 18:29
well we did or allowed it to be done to ourselves so in the parlance roll over and enjoy it or fix it

afaik the politicians won't fix it so......................... bohica

It has been said people get the government they deserve. never has that been more true.

Dutch Nick
08-30-2006, 06:23
Here's another example from today's news:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - An Iraqi architect on Tuesday said he was forced to change his t-shirt before boarding a flight in New York because the shirt had "We will not be silent" written on it in Arabic and English.

Raed Jarrar wrote on his Internet blog (http://raedinthemiddle.blogspot.com) that he was required to change out of the shirt prior to boarding a JetBlue flight from New York's John F. Kennedy Airport to California this month because officials told him people were offended by the shirt.

In an interview with New York Public Radio on Tuesday, Jarrar said, "I grew up and spent all my life living under authoritarian regimes and I know that these things happen. But I'm shocked that they happened to me here, in the U.S."