stooxie
08-28-2004, 18:43
Hello,
I seem to have been bitten by the .45 ACP bug as of late was wondering what people's opinions are on a few pistols. I have been considering the Para P14-45, Glock 21 and Sig 220. I think I'm leaning towards the Para since I like the 1911 style. I realize that I need to shoot them all to make a real choicebut what about these pros and cons:
Para Ordnance P12-45
Pro:
Love the capacity and pre-ban mags are available right from Para's website. Gun reviews are all very good, especially the ones crowing about the LDA. Is the LDA the only way to go with a Para or do people still prefer the single action?
Con:
Lots of parts? Not sure if that's an issue. I suppose the 1911 design has been thoroughly vetted out by now.
Misc:
What about the Limited stuff? Worth the extra cash? I think I actually like the look of the "regular" ones better.
Sig P220
Pro:
Can't find a less-than-stellar review, everyone says their great.
Con:
Limited capacity. Yeah, yeah, 8 rounds of .45 is stil a lot.
Glock 21
Pro:
Simple design, fewer parts, good capacity.
Con:
All the articles about out-of-battery firing and Glock 21 KBs have me nervous. Apparently the shiny Glock reputation holds up much better with their 9mm pistols than their 45's. I am sure that the percentages are low, and the culprit was bad handloads but still...
Any thoughts would be great. As I said, I'm leaning towards the Para cuz I like a nice full-frame, heavy gun and I've had my eye on the 1911 style for a while. Para seems to combine a classic style with modern enhancements, accuracy, capcity and firepower.
Thanks!
-Stooxie
I seem to have been bitten by the .45 ACP bug as of late was wondering what people's opinions are on a few pistols. I have been considering the Para P14-45, Glock 21 and Sig 220. I think I'm leaning towards the Para since I like the 1911 style. I realize that I need to shoot them all to make a real choicebut what about these pros and cons:
Para Ordnance P12-45
Pro:
Love the capacity and pre-ban mags are available right from Para's website. Gun reviews are all very good, especially the ones crowing about the LDA. Is the LDA the only way to go with a Para or do people still prefer the single action?
Con:
Lots of parts? Not sure if that's an issue. I suppose the 1911 design has been thoroughly vetted out by now.
Misc:
What about the Limited stuff? Worth the extra cash? I think I actually like the look of the "regular" ones better.
Sig P220
Pro:
Can't find a less-than-stellar review, everyone says their great.
Con:
Limited capacity. Yeah, yeah, 8 rounds of .45 is stil a lot.
Glock 21
Pro:
Simple design, fewer parts, good capacity.
Con:
All the articles about out-of-battery firing and Glock 21 KBs have me nervous. Apparently the shiny Glock reputation holds up much better with their 9mm pistols than their 45's. I am sure that the percentages are low, and the culprit was bad handloads but still...
Any thoughts would be great. As I said, I'm leaning towards the Para cuz I like a nice full-frame, heavy gun and I've had my eye on the 1911 style for a while. Para seems to combine a classic style with modern enhancements, accuracy, capcity and firepower.
Thanks!
-Stooxie