What's your logic here?

I'm pointing out the difference between threats of violence (assault) and actual, physical battery.

Sharpton's opinion of who deserves to be condemned is based solely on which party was which color.

Has nothing to do with location, my friend.

And as for your story, from that article it sounds like a travesty; a miscarriage of justice. That's much closer to the Martin/Zimmerman situation than the one in the OP, though. You can't deny that.

__________________
Come on over to PureGunTalk.com: No Politics. No Religion. No Bullsh¡t.